Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicologic Pathology
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DVM, G. H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pachter, I. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DVM, G. H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pachter, I. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal Article

An Analysis of the Carcinogenesis Testing Experience of the National Cancer Institute

G. H. Hottendorf DVM, Ph.D.

Pharmaceutical Research and Development Division, Bristol-Myers Company, PO Box 657, Syracuse, New York 13201

I. J. Pachter, Ph.D.

Pharmaceutical Research and Development Division, Bristol-Myers Company, PO Box 657, Syracuse, New York 13201

Tabulations of the results of the initial approximately 200 NCI carcinogenesis bioassays conducted in mice and rats were published recently. However, no analysis of the results were provided. Such an analysis is the subject of this report.

Ninety eight NCI bioassays were positive for carcinogenicity. Only three bioassays (<2%) were negative in both species and the ratio of positive to negative bioassays was 33:1. The remaining 47% of the bioassays were considered to be suggestive or inconclusive and it is inappropriate to refer to the total positive rate as 50%. The liver was the predominant tumor site and the only tumors produced in either rodent species in 19% of the positive bioassays were in the livers of mice. The high ratio of positive to negative results and the use of the mouse liver as a discriminating target organ raise serious concerns about the carcinogenesis protocol and in the methods of evaluating the results. Several recommendations are offered which may be useful in the current reexamination of bioassay procedures.

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 22-26 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/019262338201000103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
G. H. Hottendorf
Carcinogenicity Testing of Antitumor Agents
Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 1985; 13(3): 192 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
G. H. Hottendorf and I. J. Pachter
Review and Evaluation of the NCI/NTP Carcinogenesis Bioassays
Toxicol Pathol, February 1, 1985; 13(2): 141 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]