Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicologic Pathology
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, Y.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cancer
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal Article

Initiation/Promotion Designs in Carcinogenicity Bioassays

Yuzo Hayashi

Division of Pathology, National Institute of Hygienic Sciences Kamiyoga 1-18-1, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158, Japan

Routine carcinogenicity testings have been designed and conducted primarily for providing data to show whether or not the test compounds have a potential of inducing tumors in animals. Therefore, in the case of safety assessment or risk assessment of test compounds in humans, additional data are needed, at times, to learn how intensely the test compound can induce tumors in animals or by which mechanism the test compound can induce tumors in animals. The initiation/promotion experiment is performed as a proceeding for such requests. This paper describes the updating principle and procedures to evaluate initiation effects and promotion effects separately. However, it must be realized that our present knowledge about the initiation/promotion is still limited to some qualitative evidences. Actually, we know very little about mechanistic background and quantitative aspect of the initiation/promotion such as the site or mode of action of promoter action, the organ-specificity of promoter action, or threshold of the initiator action and promoter action. All these problems are necessary to be studied systematically in order that the initiation/promotion design can make a more important contribution to the evaluation of carcinogenicity of chemicals.

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 11, No. 2, 143-148 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/019262338301100206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
Y. Hayashi, A. Maekawa, M. Takahashi, and K. Imaida
Arcinogen Risk Assessment
Toxicology and Industrial Health, September 1, 1991; 7(5-6): 297 - 304.
[PDF]