Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicologic Pathology
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hottendorf, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hottendorf, G. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal Article

Carcinogenicity Testing of Antitumor Agents

Girard H. Hottendorf

Bristol-Myers Company, Pharmaceutical Research and Development Division, Syracuse, NY 13221–4755

Carcinogenicity testing of antitumor agents in animal bioassays has been proposed because of the potential for carcinogenicity of this class of agents and the expectation that such testing may indicate prospectively the target organs of any related human oncogenesis. The literature reveals the anticipated confirmations in animals of the carcinogenicity of many antitumor agents. Furthermore, these agents have been associated with human tumors in numerous case reports. Review of the literature also indicates the inability of animal studies to predict the sites of carcinogen-induced tumors in man. The carcinogenic risk assessment of antitumor agents should begin with the determination of the ability of the agent to interact with DNA. Those agents which are capable of alkylating or binding DNA should be tested for mutagenic and teratogenic potential. The presumption of carcinogenicity should be made for DNA-reactive, mutagenic/teratogenic antitumor agents without requiring confirmation in long-term carcinogenicity bioassays in large numbers of animals. The inability of carcinogenicity studies in animals to accurately predict potential human tumor sites must also be recognized.

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 13, No. 3, 192-199 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/019262338501300305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?