Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicologic Pathology
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Devor, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Devor, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Emerging Issues in Mouse Liver Carcinogenesis

Jerrold M. Ward

Veterinary and Tumor Pathology Section, Office of Laboratory Animal Science, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201

Masa-Aki Shibata

Veterinary and Tumor Pathology Section, Office of Laboratory Animal Science, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201

Deborah E. Devor

Veterinary and Tumor Pathology Section, Office of Laboratory Animal Science, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201

The mouse liver is the primary target site for carcinogenesis of more than 200 chemicals (including pesticides. food additives, pharmaceuticals, and industrial intermediates) tested in long-term toxicity safety assessment assays. Mouse liver tumors develop through defined morphological stages (similar to those found in other species) whether their origin is of undetermined etiology (spontaneous) or induced by chemicals. The morphologic type of hepatocytes in the various stages of hepatocarcinogenesis is sometimes associated with the specific inducing agent. Liver tumors developing in toxic livers often have more benign appearances and may progress to carcinomas at a slower rate than tumors developing in histologically normal livers. Specific tumors, dependent on the inducing chemical, may regress under defined protocols. Genotoxic and nongenotoxic mouse hepatocarcinogens each may induce tumors of either high malignant or low malignant potential. Liver tumors with specific H-ras oncogene mutations may appear morphologically and biologically similar to those without proven ras mutations. Thus, distinguishing mechanism of carcinogenesis by liver tumor morphology and mutation spectra may be difficult. Additionally, the presence of liver tumors with a morphology and a ras oncogene mutation spectrum characteristic of spontaneous tumors in histologically normal livers of mice exposed to a nongenotoxic test chemical may indicate promotion of spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis by one of several potential mechanisms. Further research into the mechanisms responsible for the increased incidences of liver tumors in mice exposed to test chemicals could enhance human cancer risk assessments.

Key Words: Hepatocarcinogenesis • bioassay • H-ras • nongenotoxic carcinogens • cell proliferation

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 129-137 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/019262339602400117


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Kimura, M. Kawabe, A. Yu, H. Morishima, P. Fernandez-Salguero, G. J. Hammons, J. M. Ward, F. F. Kadlubar, and F. J. Gonzalez
Carcinogenesis of the food mutagen PhIP in mice is independent of CYP1A2
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2003; 24(3): 583 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
M. Takaoka, S. Sehata, T. Maejima, T. Imai, M. Tor, H. Satoh, K. Toyosawa, Z.-Y. Tanakamaru, T. Adachi, S. Hisada, et al.
Interlaboratory Comparison of Short-Term Carcinogenicity Studies Using CB6F1-rasH2 Transgenic Mice
Toxicol Pathol, February 1, 2003; 31(2): 191 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
G. M. Gray, I. Linkov, M. Polkanov, and R. Wilson
Liver adenomas and carcinomas: correlations and relationship to body weight in long-term rodent cancer bioassays
Toxicology and Industrial Health, July 1, 2000; 16(6): 211 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. I. Goodman, D. J. Brusick, W. M. Busey, S. M. Cohen, J. C. Lamb, and T. B. Starr
Reevaluation of the Cancer Potency Factor of Toxaphene: Recommendations from a Peer Review Panel
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2000; 55(1): 3 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Kimura, M. Kawabe, J. M. Ward, H. Morishima, F. F. Kadlubar, G. J. Hammons, P. Fernandez-Salguero, and F. J. Gonzalez
CYP1A2 is not the primary enzyme responsible for 4-aminobiphenyl-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in mice
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 1999; 20(9): 1825 - 1830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]