This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Allaben, W. T. Articles by Hart, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Allaben, W. T. Articles by Hart, R. W. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Diets Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

FDA Points-to-Consider Documents: The Need for Dietary Control for the Reduction of Experimental Variability within Animal Assays and the Use of Dietary Restriction to Achieve Dietary Control

Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, wallaben{at}nctr.fda.gov

Angelo Turturro

Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079

Julian E.A. Leakey

Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079

John E. Seng

Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079

Ronald W. Hart

Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079

Standard protocols for conducting chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies have been refined over the years to carefully control for many variables. Nevertheless, over the last 2 decades, there has been a steady increase in variability, a decrease in survival, an increase in tumor incidence rates, and an increase in the average body weight of control animals among the various rodent species and strains used for toxicity testing. These observations have prompted an evaluation of chronic study designs to determine what factor(s) may be responsible for such confounding changes. Ad libitum feeding and the selection of successful breeders with rapid offspring growth is believed to be at least partially responsible for the heavier, obese rodents with which many laboratories are coping today. As a result of these changes, some studies used for the evaluation of safety have been deemed inconclusive or inadequate for regulatory purposes and either additional supportive studies have been requested and/or studies per se have been repeated. Research on the molecular mechanisms of caloric restriction and agent-induced toxicity at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) National Center for Toxicological Research stimulated the first international conference on the biological effects of dietary restriction in 1989; this was followed in 1993 by an FDA workshop exploring the utility of dietary restriction in controlling reduced survival in chronic tests and an international conference in 1994 exploring the implications for the regulatory community of using dietary restriction in toxicity and carcinogenicity studies used in support of a sponsor's submission or in risk assessments. The outcome of that conference was the FDA's commitment to develop Points-to-Consider documents that address the issue of dietary control in chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies.

Key Words: Caloric restriction • bioassay variability • cancer bloassay • rodent survival • rodent body weight

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 24, No. 6, 776-781 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/019262339602400622


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Keenan, S. Elmore, S. Francke-Carroll, R. Kemp, R. Kerlin, S. Peddada, J. Pletcher, M. Rinke, S. P. Schmidt, I. Taylor, et al. Best Practices for Use of Historical Control Data of Proliferative Rodent Lesions Toxicol Pathol, August 1, 2009; 37(5): 679 - 693. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I H E Kasanen, K J Inhila, O M Vainio, V V Kiviniemi, J Hau, M Scheinin, S M Mering, and T O Nevalainen The diet board: welfare impacts of a novel method of dietary restriction in laboratory rats Lab Anim, July 1, 2009; 43(3): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I H E Kasanen, K J Inhila, J I Nevalainen, S B Vaisanen, A M O Mertanen, S M Mering, and T O Nevalainen A novel dietary restriction method for group-housed rats: weight gain and clinical chemistry characterization Lab Anim, April 1, 2009; 43(2): 138 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-F. Hubert, P. Laroque, J.-P. Gillet, and K. P. Keenan The Effects of Diet, ad Libitum Feeding, and Moderate and Severe Dietary Restriction on Body Weight, Survival, Clinical Pathology Parameters, and Cause of Death in Control Sprague-Dawley Rats Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2000; 58(1): 195 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kemi, K. P. Keenan, C. Mccoy, C.-M. Hoe, K. A. Soper, G. C. Ballam, and M. J. Van Zwieten The Relative Protective Effects of Moderate Dietary Restriction versus Dietary Modification on Spontaneous Cardiomyopathy in Male Sprague-Dawley Rats Toxicol Pathol, March 1, 2000; 28(2): 285 - 296. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Green The Regulatory Perspective on the Role of Toxicology in Protecting the Public Health International Journal of Toxicology, April 1, 1999; 18(3): 209 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. K. Haseman, J. R. Hailey, and R. W. Morris Spontaneous Neoplasm Incidences in Fischer 344 Rats and B6C3F1 Mice in Two-Year Carcinogenicity Studies: A National Toxicology Program Update Toxicol Pathol, May 1, 1998; 26(3): 428 - 441. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. A. Leakey, J. E. Seng, C. R. Barnas, V. M. Baker, and R. W. Hart A Mechanistic Basis for the Beneficial Effects of Caloric Restriction On Longevity and Disease: Consequences for the Interpretation of Rodent Toxicity Studies International Journal of Toxicology, January 1, 1998; 17(2_suppl): 5 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. K. Haseman, G. A. Boorman, and J. Huff Value of Historical Control Data and Other Issues Related to the Evaluation of Long-Term Rodent Carcinogenicity Studies Toxicol Pathol, September 1, 1997; 25(5): 524 - 527. [PDF]

				B. Schwetz Evolving Picture of Carcinogenicity Evaluation Within the Food and Drug Administration Toxicol Pathol, March 1, 1997; 25(2): 239 - 239. [PDF]