Toxicologic Pathology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartke, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hartke, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 143-147 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/019262339902700126
© 1999 Society of Toxicologic Pathology

Preclinical Development of Agents for the Treatment of Osteoporosis

James R. Hartke

Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Mason, Ohio 45040

Because of the high cost and long time frame of clinical testing, animal models play a crucial role in the identification and selection of agents for the treatment of osteoporosis. The use of animal models early in a program focuses on the establishment of efficacy, while animal models used later in a program to examine bone safety. More specifically, animal models are used to gain information on the skeletal mechanism of action, to examine multiple skeletal sites (axial and appendicular), and to examine the effects of higher doses than will be used in humans. Animal models also predict the usefulness of surrogate markers in clinical trials, such as formation and resorption markers, as well as bone density. The hazard of using surrogate markers for fracture prevention is highlighted by high dose fluoride administration, which can increase bone density (considered a strong predictor of fracture protection) while not protecting against fractures. Estrogen-deficient models are most commonly used to mimic the postmenopausal bone loss in women; these models are characterized by increased bone turnover and a negative bone balance. The timing of the administration of the new therapy in animal models can help determine whether the agent will be more effective in the prevention of osteoporosis or in the treatment of established osteoporosis. New methods for the measurement of bone mass or volume are less invasive, require shorter acquisition time, and have enhanced resolution, resulting in increased knowledge concerning architectural changes and specific sites of bone deposition. Finally, the measurement of biomechanical strength of bones from animal models can be used to predict protective effects on fracture rates in clinical trials. When used in combination with other methods, animal models can greatly increase our understanding of the pathophysiology of osteoporosis and can expedite the development of new therapies.

Key Words: Osteopenia • postmenopausal • bone • animal models • therapy • review


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?