| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Comparative and Correlative Neuroanatomy for the Toxicologic PathologistAmgen, Thousand Oaks, California 91320 Xenobiotic-induced neuroanatomic alterations are always regarded as adverse and are commonly used to define reference doses to manage neurotoxic risk. Thus, the neuropathologist plays an essential role in evaluating potential neurotoxicants. The pathologist must be able to recognize the morphologic differences that exist among species, strains, and ages or between genders (comparative neuroanatomy) and to grasp the impact of structural damage on neural function (correlative neuroanatomy). Brain anatomy and function may be used to group the mammals used in neurotoxicity bioassays into 3 classes: rodent, carnivore, and primate. Neural function may or may not be affected by the structural divergence. Rodents are preferred for neurotoxicity assays because their reduced body size allows optimal perfusion at little cost and their smaller brain size permits screening of multiple regions using few sections. However, care must be exercised when interpreting rodent neuropathology data because the rodent paleocortex does not recapitulate the sophisticated neocortical circuitry and functions of carnivores and primates. Knowledge of the neuroanatomic variations that exist among test species assists the neuropathologist in defining the relevance of structural alterations, the potential clinical sequelae of such findings, and the possible significance of similar changes in humans.
Key Words: Review • carnivore • chicken • dog • primate • rat • rodent • neuropathology • neurotoxicology
Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 28, No. 1,
6-27 (2000) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
