Toxicologic Pathology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, G.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, G.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 28, No. 2, 215-225 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/019262330002800201


Reviews

Review Article: Paradoxical Effects of Phenobarbital on Mouse Hepatocarcinogenesis

Gang-Hong Lee

Pathology Research Unit, National Yakumo Hospital, Yakumo-cho, Hokkaido 049-3198, Japan, lee{at}host.or.jp

Phenobarbital was the first tumor promoter for rodent liver to be associated with the 2-stage or initiation-promotion concept of carcinogenesis. In rats and mice preinitiated with genotoxic carcinogens, phenobarbital administration increases the number of hepatocellular tumors by approximately 5-fold despite its nongenotoxicity. However, in mice phenobarbital occasionally exhibits strong inhibitory effects on hepatocarcinogenesis initiated with the potent carcinogen diethylnitrosamine. Both positive and negative effects of phenobarbital on hepatocytic proliferation and apoptosis, which are mechanistically involved in the promotion stage of hepatocarcinogenesis, have been described. These complex outcomes of phenobarbital treatment and their effects on hepatocarcinogenesis in mice raise serious issues regarding extrapolation of experimental data from laboratory animals to human risk assessment. Recent work suggests that the paradoxical actions of phenobarbital on hepatocarcinogenesis can be understood by consideration of qualitative diversity in initiated lesions and differential responses to promotion stimulus.

Key Words: Hepatocarcinogenesis • phenobarbital • promotion • inhibition • mouse


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
N. Bhattacharjee, S. Pathak, and A. R. Khuda-Bukhsh
Amelioration of Carcinogen-Induced Toxicity in Mice by Administration of a Potentized Homeopathic Drug, Natrum Sulphuricum 200
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., June 19, 2007; (2007) nem067v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
W. Bursch, M. Chabicovsky, U. Wastl, B. Grasl-Kraupp, K. Bukowska, H. Taper, and R. Schulte-Hermann
Apoptosis in Stages of Mouse Hepatocarcinogenesis: Failure to Counterbalance Cell Proliferation and to Account for Strain Differences in Tumor Susceptibility
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2005; 85(1): 515 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
A. Nishikawa, T. Imazawa, Y. Kuroiwa, Y. Kitamura, K. Kanki, Y. Ishii, T. Umemura, and M. Hirose
Induction of Colon Tumors in C57BL/6J Mice Fed MeIQx, IQ, or PhIP Followed by Dextran Sulfate Sodium Treatment
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2005; 84(2): 243 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. Hayashi, T. Tamura, J. Kuroda, H. Ohnota, N. Shibata, M. Akahane, Y. Kashida, and K. Mitsumori
Different Inhibitory Effects in the Early and Late Phase of Treatment with KAT-681, a Liver-Selective Thyromimetic, on Rat Hepatocarcinogenesis Induced by 2-Acetylaminofluorene and Partial Hepatectomy after Diethylnitrosamine Initiation
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2005; 84(1): 22 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
J. E. Trosko and B. L. Upham
The emperor wears no clothes in the field of carcinogen risk assessment: ignored concepts in cancer risk assessment
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 81 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
J. E. TROSKO, C.-C. CHANG, B. L. UPHAM, and M.-H. TAI
Ignored Hallmarks of Carcinogenesis: Stem Cells and Cell-Cell Communication
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2004; 1028(1): 192 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
X. Yang, J. Tang, C. E. Rogler, and P. Stanley
Reduced Hepatocyte Proliferation is the Basis of Retarded Liver Tumor Progression and Liver Regeneration in Mice Lacking N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III
Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 7753 - 7759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]