|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 28, No. 2,
215-225 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/019262330002800201
Review Article: Paradoxical Effects of Phenobarbital on Mouse Hepatocarcinogenesis
Gang-Hong Lee
Pathology Research Unit, National Yakumo Hospital, Yakumo-cho, Hokkaido 049-3198, Japan, lee{at}host.or.jp
Phenobarbital was the first tumor promoter for rodent liver to be associated with the 2-stage or initiation-promotion concept of carcinogenesis. In rats and mice preinitiated with genotoxic carcinogens, phenobarbital administration increases the number of hepatocellular tumors by approximately 5-fold despite its nongenotoxicity. However, in mice phenobarbital occasionally exhibits strong inhibitory effects on hepatocarcinogenesis initiated with the potent carcinogen diethylnitrosamine. Both positive and negative effects of phenobarbital on hepatocytic proliferation and apoptosis, which are mechanistically involved in the promotion stage of hepatocarcinogenesis, have been described. These complex outcomes of phenobarbital treatment and their effects on hepatocarcinogenesis in mice raise serious issues regarding extrapolation of experimental data from laboratory animals to human risk assessment. Recent work suggests that the paradoxical actions of phenobarbital on hepatocarcinogenesis can be understood by consideration of qualitative diversity in initiated lesions and differential responses to promotion stimulus.
Key Words: Hepatocarcinogenesis phenobarbital promotion inhibition mouse

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Bhattacharjee, S. Pathak, and A. R. Khuda-Bukhsh
Amelioration of Carcinogen-Induced Toxicity in Mice by Administration of a Potentized Homeopathic Drug, Natrum Sulphuricum 200
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med.,
June 19, 2007;
(2007)
nem067v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Bursch, M. Chabicovsky, U. Wastl, B. Grasl-Kraupp, K. Bukowska, H. Taper, and R. Schulte-Hermann
Apoptosis in Stages of Mouse Hepatocarcinogenesis: Failure to Counterbalance Cell Proliferation and to Account for Strain Differences in Tumor Susceptibility
Toxicol. Sci.,
May 1, 2005;
85(1):
515 - 529.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Nishikawa, T. Imazawa, Y. Kuroiwa, Y. Kitamura, K. Kanki, Y. Ishii, T. Umemura, and M. Hirose
Induction of Colon Tumors in C57BL/6J Mice Fed MeIQx, IQ, or PhIP Followed by Dextran Sulfate Sodium Treatment
Toxicol. Sci.,
April 1, 2005;
84(2):
243 - 248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hayashi, T. Tamura, J. Kuroda, H. Ohnota, N. Shibata, M. Akahane, Y. Kashida, and K. Mitsumori
Different Inhibitory Effects in the Early and Late Phase of Treatment with KAT-681, a Liver-Selective Thyromimetic, on Rat Hepatocarcinogenesis Induced by 2-Acetylaminofluorene and Partial Hepatectomy after Diethylnitrosamine Initiation
Toxicol. Sci.,
March 1, 2005;
84(1):
22 - 28.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Trosko and B. L. Upham
The emperor wears no clothes in the field of carcinogen risk assessment: ignored concepts in cancer risk assessment
Mutagenesis,
March 1, 2005;
20(2):
81 - 92.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. TROSKO, C.-C. CHANG, B. L. UPHAM, and M.-H. TAI
Ignored Hallmarks of Carcinogenesis: Stem Cells and Cell-Cell Communication
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,
December 1, 2004;
1028(1):
192 - 201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Yang, J. Tang, C. E. Rogler, and P. Stanley
Reduced Hepatocyte Proliferation is the Basis of Retarded Liver Tumor Progression and Liver Regeneration in Mice Lacking N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III
Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2003;
63(22):
7753 - 7759.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|