Toxicologic Pathology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashby, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashby, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 28, No. 3, 432-437 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/019262330002800312

Validation of In Vitro and In Vivo Methods for Assessing Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals

John Ashby

Zeneca Central Toxicology Laboratory, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom, John.Ashby{at}CTL.Zeneca.com

The concepts that require validation in terms of the subject of endocrine disruption are listed and discussed. The main mechanisms by which endocrine disruption can occur are identified, and the assays required for the detection of adverse endocrine disruption toxicities associated with these mechanisms are discussed. The process of assay validation is considered. The validation of structure-activity relationships, the need for reference chemicals, and the problems recently encountered when attempting to reproduce endocrine disruption data are also explored. The most important conclusions derived from this analysis are that given the immature state of research into endocrine disruption toxicity, testing strategies and the types of assay employed should be kept under constant review; inevitably researchers need to accept the fact that future revision of each assay will be required. Second, given the current absence of any chemical that is universally accepted to be devoid of endocrine toxicity, assay specificity will be difficult to assess, and that imposes the need for alternative objective criteria for assessing the value of individual assays.

Key Words: Endocrine disruptors • endocrine modulators • testing strategy • assays • validation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. B. Hayes, A. Collins, M. Lee, M. Mendoza, N. Noriega, A. A. Stuart, and A. Vonk
Hermaphroditic, demasculinized frogs after exposure to the herbicide atrazine at low ecologically relevant doses
PNAS, April 16, 2002; 99(8): 5476 - 5480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
L. Tryphonas and C. Gopinath
A Synopsis of the Third International Federation of Societies of Toxicologic Pathologists Conference
Toxicol Pathol, May 1, 2000; 28(3): 370 - 374.
[PDF]