Toxicologic Pathology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Floyd, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ochoa, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Floyd, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ochoa, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 30, No. 1, 147-156 (2002)
DOI: 10.1080/01926230252824860

The Trp53 Hemizygous Mouse in Pharmaceutical Development: Points to Consider for Pathologists

Eugenia Floyd

Pfizer Nagoya Laboratories, Taketoyo, Aichi, Japan 470-2393, floyd{at}groton.pfizer.com

Peter Mann

Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc., Galena, Maryland 21635

Gerald Long

Eli Lilly & Co., Greenfield, Indiana 46140

Ricardo Ochoa

Pfizer Groton Laboratories, Groton, Connecticut 06340

ILSI-HESI sponsored an international consortium for the evaluation of alternative models, including the Trp53+ /- mouse, for use in short-term carcinogenicity testing of pharmaceuticals. Products of the ILSI evaluation included guidance for protocol design and assay interpretation, spontaneous tumor incidences, diagnostic criteria for common proliferative lesions, and results of assays for pharmaceutical agents that are known human and/or rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens. Based on the ILSI evaluation, recommended protocol elements for this model include: 26-week study duration, groups ≥15/sex/dose, a positive control group (benzene or p-cresidine), a negative control group and 3 dose groups, the high dose set at MTD or MFD, routine in-life evaluations, and complete necropsies with microscopic evaluation of tissues. Favored statistical analyses are trend tests or pair-wise comparisons, with no adjustments for survival. For an assay to be valid, positive control groups must demonstrate an effect, and the MTD or MFD must be reached in both sexes. Criteria for a negative response include a valid assay, no statistical increase in common tumors, no biologically significant numerical increase in rare tumors, and no tumor incidence above that of historical controls. Positive responses can consist of statistically significant increases in the incidence of a common tumor or numerical increases in a rare tumor, which may not be statistically significant. In either case, the incidence should be clearly above historical control values. Evidence of a dose response or occurrence of hyperplasia in a tissue with a neoplastic response can support interpreting an assay as positive. The two most common spontaneous tumors (>1%) in Trp53+/- mice are malignant thymic lymphomas and subcutaneous sarcomas. Use of implanted electronic transponders can increase the incidence of sarcomas. Important rare spontaneous tumors (incidence ≤1%) are osteosarcomas and pulmonary adenomas. Many other tumor types have been reported to occur sporadically in Trp53+/- mice. Diagnostic challenges for this model include differentiating lymphoma from atypical thymic hyperplasia and recognizing the variable histopathology of subcutaneous sarcomas. In reported bioassays, Trp53+/- mice responded positively to genotoxic carcinogens, negatively to non-genotoxic rodent carcinogens, and negatively to noncarcinogens, indicating that unlike the 2-year mouse assay, this short-term assay is not overly sensitive. Positive responses often elicited an increase in tumors that occur spontaneously. To successfully use this model, pathologists must understand the biology of the Trp53 tumor suppressor gene and the principles of protocol design and data interpretation for short-term bioassays. They must also know the historical response pattern of Trp53+/- mice to test agents and be able to accurately diagnose tumors in this model. Use of the Trp53+/- mouse presents the pharmaceutical industry with several challenges, one of which is managing the uncertainty created by a lack of precedents for regulatory decisions about some possible outcomes for short-term carcinogenicity assays.

Key Words: p53 • carcinogenicity • cancer • tumor • short-term assay • bioassay • alternative model • genetically modified • knockout.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?