This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Williams, G. M. Articles by Iatropoulos, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Williams, G. M. Articles by Iatropoulos, M. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Alteration of Liver Cell Function and Proliferation: Differentiation Between Adaptation and Toxicity

New York Medical College, Department of Pathology, Basic Science Building, Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, New York 10595, USA

Michael J. Iatropoulos

New York Medical College, Department of Pathology, Basic Science Building, Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, New York 10595, USA

Exposure of experimental animals to biologically effective levels of chemicals, either endogenous or exogenous, the latter of either synthetic or natural origin, elicits a response(s) that reflects the diverse ways in which the various units of organization of an organism deal with chemical perturbation. For some chemicals, an initial response constitutes an adaptive effect that maintains homeostasis. Disruption of this equilibrium at any level of organization leads to an adverse effect, or toxicity. The livers of laboratory animals and humans, like other organs, undergo programmed phases of growth and development, characterized by proliferation followed by differentiation. With organ maturity, the process of differentiation leads to the commitment of differentiated cells to constitutive functions that maintain homeostasis and to specialized functions that serve organismal needs. In the mature livers of all species, proliferation of all cell types subsides to a low level. Thus, the mature liver consists of 2 types of cells: intermediate cells, the hepatocytes, which replicate infrequently, but can respond to signals for replication, and replicating cells, the stem cells, endothelial, Kupffer, and stellate cells (Ito or pericytes), bile duct epithelium, and granular lymphocytes (pit cells). Quantifiable alterations or effects at the molecular level underlie alterations at the organelle level, which in turn lead to alterations at the cellular level, which can ultimately be manifested as a change in the whole organism. Alterations can be quantal (binary), either all or none, as with cell replication, cell necrosis or apoptosis, and cell differentiation, which take place at the cellular level. They can also be graded or continuous (nonbinary), as with enzyme induction, organelle hypertrophy, and extracellular matrix elaboration, occurring either at the intra- or extra (supra) cellular level. Any quantifiable change induced in the function or structure of a cell or tissue constitutes a response or effect. Each of the several types of cell in the liver responds to a given stimulus according to its localization and function. Generally, renewing cells are more vulnerable to chemical injury than intermediate cells, which are largely quiescent. Hepatic adaptive responses usually involve actions of the chemical on cellular regulatory pathways, often receptor mediated, leading to changes in gene expression and ultimately alteration of the metabolome. The response is directed toward maintaining homeostasis through modulation of various cellular and extracellular functions. At all levels of organization, adaptive responses are beneficial in that they enhance the capacity of all units to respond to chemical induced stress, are reversible and preserve viability. Such adaptation at subtoxic exposures is also referred to as hormesis. In contrast, adverse or toxic effects in the liver often involve chemical reaction with cellular macromolecules and produce disruption of homeostasis. Such effects diminish the capacity for response, can be nonreversible at all levels of organization, and can compromise viability. An exposure that elicits an adaptive response can produce toxicity with longer or higher exposures (ie, above a threshold) and the mechanism of action changes with the effective dose. A variety of hepatic adaptive and toxic effects has been identified. Examples of adaptive effects are provided by phenobarbital and ciprofibrate, whereas p-dichlorobenzene and 2-acetylaminofluorene illustrate different toxic effects. The effects of chemicals in the liver are, in general, similar between experimental animals and humans, although exceptions exist. Thus, identification and monitoring of both types of effect are integral in the safety assessment of chemical exposures.

Key Words: Liver cell function • liver cell structure • proliferation • adaptation • toxicity • adverse effects • nonadverse effects.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Makino, K. Ishikawa, I. Igarashi, T. Yamoto, S. Manabe, and H. Nakayama Relationship between GST Yp Induction and Hepatocyte Proliferation in Rats Treated with Phase II Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Inducers Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2008; 36(3): 420 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B Jonas and J. A Ives Should we explore the clinical utility of hormesis? Human and Experimental Toxicology, February 1, 2008; 27(2): 123 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. M. Williams, M. J. Iatropoulos, and A. M. Jeffrey Thresholds for the Effects of 2-Acetylaminofluorene in Rat Liver Toxicol Pathol, February 1, 2004; 32(2_suppl): 85 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF]