This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Latendresse, J. R. Articles by Creasy, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Latendresse, J. R. Articles by Creasy, D. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Fixation of Testes and Eyes Using a Modified Davidson's Fluid: Comparison with Bouin's Fluid and Conventional Davidson's Fluid

Pathology Associates, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, jlatendresse{at}nctr.fda.gov.

Alan R. Warbrittion

Pathology Associates, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079

Henning Jonassen

Huntingdon Life Sciences, East Millstone, New Jersey 08875, USA

Dianne M. Creasy

Huntingdon Life Sciences, East Millstone, New Jersey 08875, USA

Most recent revisions of regulatory guidelines for testing effects of chemicals on reproduction recommend Bouin's fluid (BF) or a "comparable fixative" instead of formalin to preserve the morphologic detail of testes for histopathological evaluation. However, picric acid in BF is a health and safety hazard, as well as a laboratory waste disposal problem. Furthermore, use of BF is labor intensive, requiring multiple alcohol rinses to remove picric acid for optimum preservation and immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of testicular antigens that may potentially be used to identify and quantify cells and functional proteins with critical roles in spermatogenesis. Recently a modified Davidson's fluid (mDF) has been reported as an alternative to BF to fix testes for routine histopathological examination. This study compared the overall histomorphologic clarity and the immunoand histochemical staining of testicular specimens fixed in BF and mDF. Additionally, because conventional Davidson's fixative (DF) is used routinely for optimum fixation of eyes, preservation of ocular histomorphology by DF and mDF was compared. mDF resulted in noticeably less shrinkage of the seminiferous tubules and superior overall morphologic detail compared to BF. Unlike DF, the mDF also supported excellent staining of acrosomes with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) reagent when staging of spermatogenesis was required. IHC detection of androgen receptor and PCNA (to directly and indirectly identify Sertoli cells) as well as protein gene product 9.5 (to label spermatogonia) was superior in mDF compared to BF-fixed specimens. For histopathological examination of the eye, apposition and preservation of rods and cones, and nuclear layers of the retina were slightly inferior with mDF compared to DF. This paper has demonstrated that mDF provides comparable, and in many respects superior preservation of the testes to that of BF, both for IHC staining and for detailed histopathological examination. It also provides an acceptable fixative for eyes, although the quality of cellular preservation is inferior to that of DF.

Key Words: Immunohistochemistry • histochemistry • fixation • histomorphology • methods • spermatogonia • Sertoli cell antigenic markers • Davidson's fixative • Bouin's fixative.

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 524-533 (2002)
DOI: 10.1080/01926230290105721


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Giffin, S. E. Franks, J. R. Rodriguez-Sosa, A. Hahnel, and P. M. Bartlewski A Study of Morphological and Haemodynamic Determinants of Testicular Echotexture Characteristics in the Ram Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1, 2009; 234(7): 794 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Slesinski and D. Turnbull Chronic Inhalation Exposure of Rats for up to 104 Weeks to a Non-Carbon-Based Magnetite Photocopying Toner International Journal of Toxicology, November 1, 2008; 27(6): 427 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. G. Wade, A. Kawata, A. Williams, and C. Yauk Methoxyacetic Acid-Induced Spermatocyte Death Is Associated with Histone Hyperacetylation in Rats Biol Reprod, May 1, 2008; 78(5): 822 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. G. Short Safety Evaluation of Ocular Drug Delivery Formulations: Techniques and Practical Considerations Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 49 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Latendresse, L. Muskhelishvili, A. Warbritton, and W. H. Tolleson Two Cases of Uveal Amelanotic Melanoma in Transgenic Tyr-HRAS+ Ink4a/Arf Heterozygous Mice Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2007; 35(6): 825 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Howroyd, R. Hoyle-Thacker, O. Lyght, D. Williams, and E. Kleymenova Morphology of the Fetal Rat Testis Preserved in Different Fixatives Toxicol Pathol, February 1, 2005; 33(2): 300 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. J. Barlow, B. S. Mcintyre, and P. M.D. Foster Male Reproductive Tract Lesions at 6, 12, and 18 Months of Age Following in Utero Exposure to Di(n-butyl) Phthalate Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1): 79 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]