Toxicologic Pathology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardiff, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gregg, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardiff, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gregg, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 32, No. 1 suppl, 31-39 (2004)
DOI: 10.1080/01926230490424662

Validation: The New Challenge for Pathology

Robert D. Cardiff

Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA, rdcardiff{at}ucdavis.edu

Andrea Rosner

Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA, Current Address: Department of Radiotherapy Radiation Oncology, Experimental Center, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Michael A. Hogarth

Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

Jose J. Galvez

Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

Alexander D. Borowsky

Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

Jeffrey P. Gregg

Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

Modern pathologists have been challenged to "validate" mouse models of human cancer. Validation requires matching of morphological attributes of the model to human disease. Computers can assist in the validation process. However, adequate controlled, computer-readable vocabularies that can match terms do not currently exist in mouse pathology. Further, current standard diagnostic terminologies do not include the new concepts discussed here such as pathway pathology and mammary intraepithelial neoplasia. The terminologies must be revised and improved to meet the challenge. Human medicine has traditionally used "guilt-by-association" to validate interpretations of disease. Experimental pathology uses experimental verification exemplified by "test-by-transplantation." Genetically Engineered Mice (GEM) develop unique tumor phenotypes bringing new structural-functional insights and reevaluation of concepts. Novel GEM-related tumors appear in all organ systems but mouse models of human breast cancer are prototypes. For example, mammary tumors induced by Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus (MMTV), chemical, radiation or other carcinogenic stimuli have limited phenotypes. These "spontaneous" or induced mammary tumors have never resembled human breast cancers. GEM tumors created with genes associated with human cancer are strikingly different. GEM tumors have unique histological phenotypes. Depending on the genes, the tumors may: 1) resemble MMTV-induced tumors, 2) display "signature" phenotypes, and 3) mimic human breast cancers. The phenotypes can be placed into structural and functional clusters with shared characteristics leading to the concepts of Pathway Pathology: tumor phenotype reflects the genotype.

Key Words: Pathology • informatics • mouse models • breast cancer • genetically engineered mice • validation • vocabulary.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
R. D. Cardiff, M. R. Anver, G. P. Boivin, M. W. Bosenberg, R. R. Maronpot, A. A. Molinolo, A. Y. Nikitin, J. E. Rehg, G. V. Thomas, R. G. Russell, et al.
Precancer in Mice: Animal Models Used to Understand, Prevent, and Treat Human Precancers
Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2006; 34(6): 699 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]