Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicologic Pathology
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text Free
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardisty, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Brix, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardisty, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Brix, A. E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Medicines
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Comparative Hepatic Toxicity: Prechronic/Chronic Liver Toxicity in Rodents

Jerry F. Hardisty and Amy E. Brix

Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence to: Dr. Jerry F. Hardisty, Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc., P.O. Box 12766, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA; e-mail:jhardisty{at}epl-inc.com

The morphologic assessment of the gross and microscopic appearance of the liver can provide a broad base of knowledge concerning the potential toxicity of a drug or chemical. This information may either lead to an understanding of the underlying mechanism of toxicity or guide further study to discern the mode of action of the hepatotoxicity. In standard regulatory bioassays, toxicity studies are conducted during phase 1 and phase 2 of the development process to define the acute, subchronic and chronic toxicity of the test compound. In the liver, there are a limited number of morphologic changes that can be identified using conventional light microscopy. These morphologic alterations are often characterized as "adaptive," consisting of an exaggerated normal physiologic response; "pharmacologic," consisting of an expected alteration in response to the desired action of the test article; or "adverse," consisting of morphologic alterations that are generally undesired, progressive and deleterious to the normal function of the cell(s) involved. Morphologic evidence of adverse effects may involve hepatocytes, the biliary system, hepatic vasculature, Kupffer cells, or stellate cells (Ito cells). In drug discovery and development programs, it is necessary to utilize a multidisciplinary approach, using different endpoints, to investigate the same or similar biological responses in the liver. This results in large amounts of data that must be organized in a retrievable fashion. In order for such a multidisciplinary approach to succeed, each discipline must organize and generate their data in a manner that is easily used by others in the process. The toxicologic pathologist must develop and use standardized nomenclature and diagnostic criteria when examining the liver so that data from various investigators can be compared in a useful manner.

Key Words: Liver • rodent • toxicity • imaging techniques • nomenclature • diagnostic criteria

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 33, No. 1, 35-40 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/01926230590522077


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?