Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register for free online access

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicologic Pathology
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text Free
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Short, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Short, B. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Articles

Safety Evaluation of Ocular Drug Delivery Formulations: Techniques and Practical Considerations

Brian G. Short

From Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence to: Brian G. Short, Allergan, Inc., 2525 Dupont Dr. RD-2A, Irvine, CA 92612.

Development of new drug candidates and novel delivery techniques for treatment of ocular diseases has recently accelerated. Treatment of anterior-segment diseases has witnessed advances in prodrug formulations and permeability enhancers. Intravitreal, subconjunctival, and periocular routes of administration and sustained-release formulations of nanoparticles and microparticles, as well as nonbiodegradable and biodegradable implants to deliver drugs to the posterior segment of the eye, are becoming popular therapeutic approaches. Without adequate regulatory guidance for ocular drugs, such routes of administration and novel formulations can pose unique challenges to those involved in designing nonclinical programs, including considering clinical and nonclinical factors and choosing species, strains, and ocular toxicity parameters. Toxicologic pathologists also contribute practical experience to evaluating morphological effects of these novel formulations. Lastly, understanding species’ anatomical differences is useful for interpreting toxicological and pathological responses to the eye and is important for human risk assessment of these important new therapies for ocular diseases.

Key Words: Ocular drug delivery • intravitreal • subconjunctival • periocular • ocular implant

Abbreviations: AMD, age-related macular degeneration • CNTF, ciliary neurotrophic factor • DDS, drug delivery system • ECT, encapsulated cell technology • ERG, electroretinogram • EVA, ethylene vinyl acetate • FIHS, first in human studies • FDA, Food and Drug Administration • ICH, International Conference on Harmonization • IOP, intraocular pressure • ISO, International Standards Organization • ITV, intravitreal • NCE, new chemical entity • NZW, New Zealand White • OECD, Organisation for European Cooperation and Development • PLA, poly-lactic acid • PLGA, poly-lactic-glycolic acid • PVA, polyvinyl alcohol • RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase • TA, triamcinolone acetonide • TLRs, toll-like receptors • VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 36, No. 1, 49-62 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0192623307310955


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?