This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0192623309345871v1 37/6/708    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Atalic, B. Articles by Fatovic-Ferencic, S. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Atalic, B. Articles by Fatovic-Ferencic, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Emanuel Edward Klein—The Father of British Microbiology and the Case of the Animal Vivisection Controversy of 1875

Bruno Atali¹ and Stella Fatovi-Fereni^1,2

¹ School of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University, Osijek, Croatia
² Department for the History and Philosophy of Sciences, Division for the History of Medical Sciences, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Zagreb, Croatia

Correspondence: Stella Fatovi-Fereni, Department for the History and Philosophy of Sciences, Division for the History of Medical Sciences, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Gundulieva 24, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; e-mail:stella{at}hazu.hr.

The new Appendix A of the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, which gives guidelines for accommodation and care of animals and was approved on June 15, 2006, was the main reason the authors decided to investigate the origins of the regulations of animal experiments. Although one might assume that the regulation had its origin in the United Nations conventions, the truth is that its origins are a hundred years old. The authors present a case of the nineteenth-century vivisection controversy brought about by the publication of the Handbook for the Physiological Laboratory in 1873, in which John Burdon-Sanderson, Emanuel Edward Klein, Michael Foster, and Thomas Lauder Brunton described a series of vivisection experiments they performed on animals for research purposes. It was the first case of vivisection to be examined, processed, and condemned for inhuman behavior toward animals before an official body, leading to enactment of the Cruelty to Animals Act in 1876. The case reveals a specific ethos of science in the second half of the nineteenth century, which was characterized by a deep commitment of scientists to the scientific enterprise and their strong belief that science could solve social problems, combined with an overt insensitivity to the suffering of experimental animals. The central figure in the case was Emanuel Edward Klein, a disciple of the Central European medical tradition (Vienna Medical School) and a direct follower of the experimental school of Brücke, Stricker, Magendie, and Bernard. Because of his undisguised attitudes and opinions on the use of vivisection, Klein became a paradigm of the new scientific identity, strongly influencing the stereotypic image of a scientist, and polarizing the public opinion on vivisection in England in the nineteenth century and for some considerable time afterward.

Key Words: Klein • Emanuel Edward • physiology • nineteenth century • vivisectionism • antivivisectionism • United Kingdom

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 37, No. 6, 708-713 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0192623309345871


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?