Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicologic Pathology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richard, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boorman, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richard, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boorman, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Transcriptional Profiling of the Left and Median Liver Lobes of Male F344/N Rats Following Exposure to Acetaminophen

Irwin D. Richard1
Joel S. Parker2
Edward K. Lobenhofer3
Leo T. Burka1
Pamela E. Blackshear4
Molly K. Vallant1
Edward H. Lebetkin1
Diane F. Gerken5
Gary A. Boorman1

1 Environmental Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
2 Constella Group, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
3 Paradigm Genetics Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
4 Integrated Laboratory Systems, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
5 Battelle Science and Technology International, Columbus, Ohio 43201, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence to: Dr. Richard D. Irwin, ETP, NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, 111 T. W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA; e-mail:irwin{at}niehs.nih.gov


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The liver is a common organ for transcriptional profiling because of its role in xenobiotic metabolism and because hepatotoxicity is a common response to chemical exposure. To explore the impact that sampling different lobes may have on transcriptional profiling experiments we have examined and compared gene expression profiles of the left and median lobes of livers from male F344 rats exposed to toxic and nontoxic doses of acetaminophen. Transcript profiling using micorarrays revealed clear differences in the response of the left and median liver lobes of F344 rats to acetaminophen exposure both at low doses as well as doses that caused hepatotoxicity. Differences were found in the total number of differentially expressed genes in the left and median lobes, the number and identity of genes that were differentially expressed uniquely only in the left or median lobe, and in the patterns of gene expression. While it is not possible to generalize these results to compounds other than acetaminophen or other strains of rat, these results highlight the potential impact of sampling differences on the interpretation of gene expression profiles in the liver.

Key Words: Liver • rat • mRNA • differential gene expression • microarray • variation • transcriptome • lobe differences • left lobe • median lobe

Abbreviations: F344, Fischer 344/N • DGE, Differential Gene Expression • NTP, National Toxicology Program • PCA, Principal Components Analysis • SAM, Significance Analysis of Microarrays


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although the liver has a uniform gross appearance there is increasing evidence of functional heterogeneity among individual liver lobes, and within different regions within the same lobe. For example iron accumulates more in the left hepatic lobe in infants (Faa et al., 1994), a pattern also seen in iron storage disease in adults (Ambu et al., 1995). Copper tends to accumulate more in the left hepatic lobe in newborn human infants (Faa et al., 1987) but more in the right hepatic lobe in Wilson’s disease (Faa et al., 1995). Diethyl-nitrosamine administration causes a higher incidence of carcinoma in the left and median lobe as compared to the right in the rat (Richardson et al., 1986). DNA damage is greater in the left and median lobes while cell replication is higher in median and right anterior lobes (Richardson et al., 1986). The progression of cirrhosis also shows lobe specific differences progressing more rapidly in the right lobe compared to the left (Matsuzaki et al., 1997).

In the developing mouse all components to the left of the falciform ligament give rise to the left lobe while all components to the right give rise to the right, median and caudate lobes (Kaufman and Bard, 1999). There is also left-right asymmetry in portal blood flow during development (Germain et al., 1987) with the fetal left liver lobe receiving more nutrients than other regions of the liver (Zhang and Bryne, 2000). Moreover, adult offspring of dams (Wistar rats) fed a low protein diet during pregnancy exhibited reduced fibrinogen mRNA levels and reduced fibrinogen protein only in the left lobe of the liver (Zhang and Bryne, 2000). These results suggest that differences between liver lobes may be "hard wired" during development.

To explore the impact that sampling different lobes may have on transcriptional profiling experiments we have examined and compared gene expression profiles of the left and median lobes of livers from male F344 rats exposed to toxic and nontoxic doses of acetaminophen. Since the development of hepatocellular necrosis in response to acetaminophen exposure appears to be similar in the left and median lobe of F344 rats, differences in gene expression may reflect intrinsic differences in the molecular response of each lobe.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Male Fischer 344 rats approximately 36 +/– 3 days old were supplied by Taconic laboratory animals (Germantown, NY) and were approximately 90+/– 4 days old when placed on test. The studies were conducted at Battelle International, Inc., Columbus, Ohio and the protocol was approved by the Battelle IACUC and followed the standards outlined in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NRC, 1996). Rats were randomized to experiments by body weight partitioning using the PATH/TOX SYSTEM (Xybion Medical Systems Corp., Cedar Knolls, NJ) algorithm. The rats were housed 3 per cage in 22'' L x 12.5'' W x 8'' H polycarbonate cages (Lab Products, Inc., Seaford, DE) with polyester cage filters (Snow Filtration Co., Cincinnati, OH). Animal room temperature and humidity were continuously monitored and varied between 71° and 75°F and 36% to 48% relative humidity. Animal room lighting followed a 12-hour light period from 8 AM to 8 PM with a corresponding 12-hour dark (night) period from 8 PM to 8 AM. Acetaminophen was administered from a continually stirred 0.5% aqueous methylcellulose vehicle at 5 ml/kg body weight by gavage at noon with necropsies at 6 PM (6 hours), 6 AM (18 hours) and 24 and 48 hours (12 PM). The acetaminophen dose levels included both 50 and 150 mg/kg as nontoxic doses and 1500 mg/kg as moderately toxic and 2000 mg/kg severely toxic doses. The controls received methylcellulose alone.

The rats had ad libitum access to irradiated NTP-2000 wafer feed (Ziegler Brothers, Gardners, PA) during the 12-hour dark period with no food present in their cage during the 12-hour light period of the daily light cycle during the experimental period. The rats had ad libitum access to city water (Columbus, OH) at all times. The room light intensity during the 12-hour light period ranged from 38–40 foot-candles measured 5 feet from the floor. The study was conducted in replicate groups of 3 to assure prompt and timely handing of the tissues for RNA analysis. The necropsies took place within 1 hour of the scheduled period of time and each liver lobe was placed in RNA stabilizer within 4 minutes of sacrifice.

The rats were anesthetized with CO2/O2, blood samples collected for clinical chemistry by cardiac puncture, the abdominal cavity opened, and the portal vein severed before necropsy.

Radioactive Acetaminophen Studies
Studies using radiolabeled acetaminophen were done at NIEHS under a NIEHS-approved animal protocol. Acetaminophen was administered to groups of 5 rats either by gavage, intraperitoneal injection (ip), or intravenous injection (iv), and the animals sacrificed with CO2 asphyxiation at the designated times after dosing. The oral dose was 2000 mg/kg 3H-acetaminophen administered as a suspension in 0.5% aqueous hydroxyethylcellulose at a dose rate of 10 ml/kg. The ip dose was 50 mg/kg in 0.5% aqueous hydroxyethylcellulose administered at 10 ml/kg, and the IV dose was 0.171 mg/kg in physiological saline. All rats received 48–55 µCi/kg 3H-acetaminophen. At 10 minutes (IV and IP study) or 10 and 30 minutes (oral study), the rats were euthanized with CO2 and O2 and the livers were promptly removed by lobe. The left and median lobes were divided into left and right halves, the right lobe separated in anterior and posterior sublobes and both caudate sublobes collected and promptly frozen. At the time of scintillation counting, the liver sections were removed, weighed, and triplicate 100 mg samples were oxidized in a Packard 307 Sample Oxidizer. Samples were counted in a Beckman LS 6500.

Histological Methods
Cross-sections of the left and median lobes of the liver were embedded, sectioned, stained with H&E and examined for histological changes. The diagnoses and severity grades were subjected to peer review as described previously (Boorman et al., 1986, 2002).

RNA Isolation
The portions of the left and median hepatic lobes for RNA isolation were chopped with sharp razors into 0.5 cm cubes or smaller in RNALater (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX) within 4 minutes of necropsy. The liver cubes were stored in RNALater overnight at 4+/– 3°C, then in RNALater at –20+/– 1°C until RNA isolation (within 60 days). For RNA isolation 130–150 mg of tissue from left or median lobe was weighed out, 1 ml of chilled lysis buffer was poured over the tissue which was then minced into 1 mm pieces. Then 7 ml of lysis buffer was then added and the tissue homogenized with a handheld Omni tissue homogenizer with a disposable plastic 7 mm diameter Omni generator probe (Omni # 34750, Omni International, Marietta, GA) at no more than 1/2 maximum speed for 45 seconds. The resulting tissue lysate was centrifuged for 5 minutes at 4000 x g, the supernatant divided into 2 tubes, 3.5 ml of 50% absolute ethanol added and the tubes vigorously shaken for 1 minute. RNeasy midi spin columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) were used for RNA isolation. The RNA was concentrated using Millipore Microcon centrifugal filter devices (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA), analyzed using a spectrophotometer (capable of reading absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm with UV light), frozen at minutes –70°C and shipped to the NTP repository until transfer to Paradigm Genetics Inc. (RTP, NC) for hybridization.

Microarray Hybridizations
The study design included 4 dose groups of 6 rats sacrificed at 4 time points. Pathological diagnoses and clinical chemistry were available from the 6 rats but RNA analysis was conducted on both the median and left hepatic lobe from 4 rats selected at random from each group. The 4 individual rats were hybridized against a pool made of equal amounts of RNA from three time matched control rats. The hybridizations were lobe specific, with median lobes from treated rats hybridized against a pool made from median lobe controls, and left lobes from treated rats hybridized against left lobe controls. One µg of total RNA from either an individual rat or from a pooled sample was amplified and labeled with a fluorescent dye (either Cy3 or Cy5) using Agilent Low RNA Input Linear Amplification labeling kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) following the manufacture’s protocol. The resulting fluorescently labeled cRNA was quantitated and qualitated using a Nanodrop ND-100 spectrophometer and an Agilent Bio-analyzer. The fluors were reversed for a second (dye reversal) hybridization. Four individual rats at 4 time points, with 4 doses, 2 hepatic lobes, and fluor reversals resulted in 256 hybrizations.

Data Analysis
Data from dye reversal hybridizations representing the same individuals were combined in the microarray analysis software package Rosetta Resolver version 4.0.0.1.1 (Rosetta Biosoftware, Seattle, WA) using a weighted average. From this combined data, up- or down-regulated genes that were significantly differentially expressed (Rosetta error model, p ≤ 0.005) for both the median and left hepatic lobe for each individual rat were identified and served as a basis for all additional analyses. Hierarchical clustering in which Pearson’s Correlation was used as the similarity metric, and Venn Diagrams used in the lobe specific gene expression, were produced in GeneSpring 6.2.2 (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City California). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to compare lobe histology results with serum ALT activity.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Acute centrilobular necrosis and inflammation were observed only at the 1500 and 2000 mg/kg doses and are consistent with acetaminophen toxicity (Table 1). Each lobe was given a severity grade depending on the overall amount of necrosis within a section. As shown in Table 1, there were some differences in severity of necrosis between the median and left lobe, however no particular pattern was evident, and there was no indication of a preference for the left or median lobe. What is not represented in the table is the often patchy distribution of necrosis not involving the entire section. Patchy hepatocellular necrosis following a single dose of acetaminophen has been reported by others (McLean and Day, 1975)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Hepatocellular centrilobular necrosis.

 
Results of clinical chemistry evaluations were also consistent with acute hepatocellular necrosis at the 1500 and 2000 mg/kg doses (Table 2). There was considerable variability of response for individual rats: for instance rats dosed with 1500 mg/kg had ALT values ranging from 96 to 6756 IU/L at 18 hours. Similarly rats dosed with 2000 mg/kg had ALT activities varying from 244 to 15,180 IU/L. A similar degree of variability was also seen at 24 hours and 48 hours (Table 3). This type of variable response to acetaminophen exposure has also been by others with unfasted animals (McLean and Day, 1975).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Selected clinical chemistry results.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Comparison of distribution of [3H]-Acetaminophen-derived radioactivity to liver section mass.

 
In an effort to compare the response of the left and median lobes we examined the correlation between histological severity grade and ALT level for each lobe. As indicated in Figure 1, the response of the median lobe was less variable than that of the left, and the correlation between severity grade and ALT levels was substantially better for the median lobe than for the left lobe.


Figure 10330111
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 Correlation of ALT levels with severity grade of histological lesions in the left (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.60) and median (r = 0.81) liver lobes.

 
We also evaluated the distribution of radioactive acetaminophen to the various hepatic lobes following oral, intravenous, and intraperitoneal exposure. Although some significant differences were found, no pattern was evident either between different lobes or between the right and left parts of the same lobe (Table 3).

The results of transcriptional profiling of the left and median lobes differed with respect to the number of genes differentially expressed in each lobe, the identity of the genes, and the patterns of gene expression between the 2 lobes. The total number of differentially expressed genes (genes differentially expressed at the p < 0.005 level in at least one animal in the dose-time group) at each time and dose were substantially different for the left and median lobe. When the stringency was increased by selecting the set of genes differentially expressed by all animals in a group (genes differentially expressed at the p < 0.005 level in each animal in the dose-time group), the differences were still present (Table 4). Although no overall pattern is apparent, in general more genes are differentially expressed in the median lobe at each time and dose than in the left lobe.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Number of genes differentially expressed in all animals by liver lobe.

 
The difference in response between lobes becomes even more apparent when comparing the number of genes differentially expressed in the left lobe only or the median lobe only to the number of genes expressed in common in both lobes (Table 5). In the 50 and 150 mg/kg dose groups the left lobe and median lobe express very few genes in common. At 1500 mg/kg a greater percentage of genes are expressed in common, however each lobe also expresses genes not expressed in the other lobe. At 2000 mg/kg all genes expressed in the left lobe are also expressed in the median lobe, however there are also genes expressed in the median lobe that are not expressed in the left lobe. Again the data also show that at nearly all doses and times, more genes are expressed uniquely in the median lobe than in the left lobe.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5 Number of genes uniquely expressed in all animals by liver lobe.

 
There were also differences in the patterns of gene expression between the left and median lobes in response to acetaminophen exposure. To examine patterns of expression we performed hierarchical clustering using Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient as a metric. We first performed unsupervised clustering with all animals from each dose group. This invariably resulted in the grouping together of all animals necropsied at the same time; thus all animals necropsied 6 hours after dosing clustered together, all animals necropsied 18 hours after dosing clustered together, etc. Therefore at this level the major factor determining membership in a cluster was the time after dosing when the animals were necropsied. However among animals necropsied at the same time, hierarchical clustering demonstrated clear differences in the patterns of gene expression between the left and median lobes. An example is shown in Figure 2 for rats necropsied 6 hours after administration of 150 mg/kg. This dendrogram shows that the left lobes from each animal form one cluster and the median lobes a second cluster. Thus, the gene expression patterns of the left or median lobes of different animals are more similar to one another than are the gene expression patterns of the left and median lobes from the same animal.


Figure 20330111
View larger version (607K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figures 2–3 FIGURE 2.—Hierarchical clustering of the median and left lobes from the livers of male F344 rats necropsied 6 hours after exposure to 150 mg/kg acetaminophen. The letter L or M after the animal number indicates left (L) or median (M) lobe. Red—up regulated relative to control; Green—down regulated relative to control; Grey—no change relative to control. 3. Hierarchical clustering of the median and left lobes from the livers of male F344 rats necropsied 18 hours after exposure to 1500 mg/kg acetaminophen. The letter L or M after the animal number indicates left (L) or median (M) lobe. Red—up-regulated relative to control; Green—down-regulated relative to control; Grey—no change relative to control.

 
This distinction was most apparent for animals necropsied 6 hours after dosing where clustering was strictly by lobe. However even at later times, clustering by lobe predominated over clustering by animal for animals necropsied at the same time (Figure 3). In this figure the left and median lobe of animal 404 and 405 are clustered together, however for the other animals in this group, left lobes clustered with left lobes and median lobes with median lobes.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Transcriptional profiling has revealed clear differences in the response of the left and median liver lobes of F344 rats to acetaminophen exposure with respect to the total number of genes differentially expressed in each lobe, the number of uniquely expressed genes in each lobe, and the pattern of expression. This was true at doses of 50 and 150 mg/kg that were not associated with any overt toxicity as well as doses of 1500 and 2000 mg/kg that caused obvious hepatotoxicity. Based on the number of genes identified as differentially expressed, the median lobe was more responsive to acetaminophen exposure than the left lobe.

Although there were differentially expressed genes in common in both lobes, there were also genes that were differentially expressed uniquely only in the left or median lobe. The most interesting difference occurred at the 2000 mg/kg dose where at each necropsy time, all genes differentially expressed in the left lobe were also differentially expressed in the median lobe, with an additional group of genes differentially expressed only in the median lobe. If only the left lobe had been sampled, this latter group of genes would not have been identified as differentially expressed.

Histopathologic analysis revealed the presence of hepatocellular necrosis in both the left and median lobes from animals exposed to 1500 or 2000 mg/kg, however the distribution of necrosis was patchy and not uniform across the section. There were some differences in lesion severity between the left and median lobes, but no obvious preference for either lobe was apparent. A similar response to acetaminophen exposure with focal areas of necrosis in one section of a lobe while other parts of the same lobe appear to be unaffected has previously been described by (McLean and Day, 1975). When the correlation between ALT levels and lobe specific severity grade was examined a significantly better correlation was found for the median lobe than for the left lobe. Thus, severity grades scored in the median lobe were more highly correlated to ALT levels than those of the left lobe.

There were also minor differences in the distribution of radioactivity among the four separate lobes, and between halves of the same lobe. However in general each of the lobes of the liver received comparable amounts of radioactive acetaminophen whether administered orally, intravenously, or intraperitoneally. There did not appear to be a differential lobe distribution based on route including oral gavage. Therefore it seems unlikely that unequal distribution of acetaminophen among the different lobes of the liver could account for all of the lobe specific differences in gene expression.

Total blood flow to each lobe is related to lobe size (Wheatley et al., 1993) however, each lobe is organized into 3-dimensional vascular units that exhibit biochemical gradients from the portal vessels entering the liver to the periphery (Teutsch, 1985; Teutsch et al., 1999). The left lobe has 1 primary portal branch but the median lobe appears to have 2 portal branches (Kogure et al., 1999) one of which it shares with the left lobe (Duchen, 1961). Therefore, nutrient levels, oxygen tension and gene expression may not be uniform across the hepatic lobe. Differences in blood flow to the various areas of the human liver (Sherriff et al., 1977) and within the left hepatic lobe in the rat (Andersson et al., 1987) suggest that not only should one address which lobe to sample for gene expression but perhaps specify whether the sample is from the hilar or peripheral part of the lobe.

Although it is not possible to generalize these results to compounds other than acetaminophen or other strains of rat, these results highlight the potential impact of sampling differences on the interpretation of gene expression profiles in the liver, or any organ for that matter, and underscore the importance of careful experimental design and complete description of exactly what tissue/organ was sampled in experiments involving gene expression profiling. Comparison of data sets from different experiments will be extremely difficult, and may be fruitless, without such information.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors acknowledge support of the National Center for Toxicogenomics NIEHS, the Battelle Columbus staff, who performed the in-life phase of the study and RNA isolation, the Investigational Genomics Group at Paradigm Genetics who performed the microarray hybridizations and QA and Sue Edelstein, Image Associates, Inc., who designed and prepared the figures.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ambu, R, Crisponi, G, Sciot, R, Van Eyken, P, Parodo, G, Iannelli, S, Marongiu, F, Silvagni, R, Nurchi, V, & Costa, V. (1995). Uneven hepatic iron and phosphorus distribution in beta-thalassemia. J Hepatol, 23, 544-9[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Andersson, A, Christensson, PI, Lewan, L, & Stenram, U. (1987). Variation of incorporation of [3H]orotic acid into the nucleoide and RNA fractions of different parts of the same liver lobe in the rat. Int J Biochem, 19, 745-8[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Boorman, GA, & Eustis, SL. In Hoover, BK, Baldwin, JK, Uelner, AF, Whitmire, CE, Davies, CL, & Bristol, DW (Eds.). (1986). The pathology working group as a means for assuring pathology quality in toxicological studies. Managing conduct and data quality of toxicological studies (pp.271-5). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Scientific Publishing Co. Inc

Boorman, GA, Haseman, JK, Waters, MD, Hardisty, JF, & Sills, RC. (2002). Quality review procedures necessary for rodent pathology databases and toxicogenomic studies: The National Toxicology Program experience. Toxicol Pathol, 30, 88-92[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Duchen, LW. (1961). The effects of deprivation of portal blood on the liver and its influence on carbon tetrachloride liver injury in the rat. Br J Exp Pathol, 42, 247-52[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Faa, G, Liguori, C, Columbano, A, & Diaz, G. (1987). Uneven copper distribution in the human newborn infant. Hepatology, 7, 838-42[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Faa, G, Nurchi, V, Demelia, L, Ambu, R, Parodo, G, Congiu, T, Sciot, R, Van Eyken, P, Silvagni, R, & Crisponi, G. (1995). Uneven hepatic copper distribution in Wilson’s disease. J Hepatol, 22, 303-8[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Faa, G, Sciot, R, Farci, AM, Callea, F, Ambu, R, Congiu, T, Van Eyken, P, Cappai, G, Marras, A, & Costa, V. (1994). Iron concentration and distribution in the newborn liver. Liver, 14, 193-9[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Germain, A, Gararido, A, Canas, P, Llanos, A, & Valenzuela, A. (1987). Differences in lipid peroxidation status, cytochrome p450 content and microsomal ozygen consumption between right and left lobes in the lier in fetal sheep. comparison with maternal liver. Biochem Internat, 15, 571-7[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Kaufman, MH, & Bard, JBL. (1999). The Anatomical Basis of Mouse Development. San Diego, California: Academic Press

Kogure, K, Ischizaki, M, Nemoto, M, Kuwano, H, & Makuuchi, M. (1999). A comparative study of the anatomy of rat and human livers. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 6, 171-5

Matsuzaki, S, Onda, M, Tajiri, T, & Kim, DY. (1997). Hepatic lobar differences in progression of chronic liver disease: correlation of asialoglycoparotein scintigraphy and hepatic functional reserve. Hepatology, 25, 828-32[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

McLean, AEM, & Day, PA. (1975). The effect of diet on the toxicity of paracetamol and the safety of paracetamol-methionine mixtures. Biochem Pharmacol, 24, 37-42[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

NRC. (1996). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

Richardson, FC, Boucheron, JA, Dryoff, MC, Popp, JA, & Swenberg, JA. (1986). Biochemical and morphologic studies of heterogeneous lobe responses in hepatocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis, 7, 247-51[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sherriff, SB, Smart, RC, & Taylor, I. (1977). Clinical study of liver blood flow in man measured by 133Xe clearance after portal vein injection. Gut, 18, 1027-31[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Teutsch, HF. (1985). Quantitative histochemical assessment of regional differences in hepatic glucose uptake and release. Histochemistry, 82, 159-64[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Teutsch, HF, Scheuerfeld, D, & Groezinger, E. (1999). Three-dimensional reconstruction of parenchymal units in the liver of the rat. Hepatology, 29, 494-505[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Wheatley, AM, Stuart, ET, Zhao, D, Zimmermann, A, Gassel, HJ, & Blumgard, LH. (1993). Effect of orthotopic transplantation and chemical denervation on the liver on hepatic hemodynamics in the rat. J Hepatol, 19, 442-50[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Zhang, J, & Bryne, CD. (2000). Differential hepatic lobar gene expression in offspring exposed to altered maternal dietary protein intake. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 278, G128-36[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 33, No. 1, 111-117 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/01926230590522257


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
S. P. Clark, T. P. Ryan, G. H. Searfoss, M. A. Davis, and S. B. Hooser
Chronic Microcystin Exposure Induces Hepatocyte Proliferation with Increased Expression of Mitotic and Cyclin-associated Genes in P53-deficient Mice
Toxicol Pathol, February 1, 2008; 36(2): 190 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Waters, S. Stasiewicz, B. Alex Merrick, K. Tomer, P. Bushel, R. Paules, N. Stegman, G. Nehls, K. J. Yost, C. H. Johnson, et al.
CEBS Chemical Effects in Biological Systems: a public data repository integrating study design and toxicity data with microarray and proteomics data
Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D892 - D900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. M. Fostel, L. Burgoon, C. Zwickl, P. Lord, J. C. Corton, P. R. Bushel, M. Cunningham, L. Fan, S. W. Edwards, S. Hester, et al.
Toward a Checklist for Exchange and Interpretation of Data from a Toxicology Study
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2007; 99(1): 26 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. F. Foley, J. B. Collins, D. M. Umbach, S. Grissom, G. A. Boorman, and A. N. Heinloth
Optimal Sampling of Rat Liver Tissue for Toxicogenomic Studies
Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2006; 34(6): 795 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richard, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boorman, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richard, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boorman, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?