This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hard, G. C. Articles by Seely, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hard, G. C. Articles by Seely, J. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Histological Investigation of Diagnostically Challenging Tubule Profiles in Advanced Chronic Progressive Nephropathy (CPN) in the Fischer 344 RaT

¹ Consultant, National Toxicology Program Archives, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
² Experimental Pathology Laboratories Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA

Correspondence: Address correspondence to: John Seely, Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; e-mail:jseely{at}eplinc.com

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Recently, guidelines were suggested for discriminating proliferative-appearing tubule profiles encountered in advanced spontaneous chronic progressive nephropathy (CPN) of rats, from hyperplastic precursors of renal tubule tumors (Hard and Seely, 2005). These recommendations were based on histological evaluation of a large number of cases of severe to end-stage CPN in male F344 rats from 8 separate 2-year carcinogenicity studies held in the Archives of the National Toxicology Program, NIEHS. This work has now been extended to characterize the various lesions further, mainly by serial sectioning to track their origin and fate within the adjacent renal tissue, but also by applying special staining procedures such as immunohistochemical assessment of proliferative activity, as well as fluorescence microscopy, to seek further differences from atypical tubule hyperplasia. The results obtained from these additional investigations support the contention that certain tubule profiles with a misleading proliferative appearance, sometimes found in advanced CPN, should be distinguished from preneoplastic tubule foci, and regarded as components of the nephropathy process.

Key Words: CPN • proliferative tubule profiles • atypical tubule hyperplasia • special stains • serial-sectioning

Abbreviations: ATH, atypical tubule hyperplasia • CPN, chronic progressive nephropathy • NTP, National Toxicology Program • PAS, periodic acid Schiff reagent • PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In routine 2-year carcinogenicity studies using conventional strains of rat, the frequency and severity of chronic progressive nephropathy (CPN), an age-related disease of spontaneous origin, can become a confounding factor in the interpretation and diagnosis of proliferative tubule profiles and their relationship to neoplastic development (Hard and Khan, 2004). This problem arises because proliferative-appearing or regenerative tubule profiles are relatively common in advanced to end-stage CPN, and difficult to distinguish from tubule preneoplasia. Furthermore, certain chemicals, including a number tested in 2-year studies by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, have enhanced the severity of CPN to an advanced state (Eustis et al., 1994; Lock and Hard, 2004), often resulting in an end-stage kidney, as was the case with hydroquinone (Hard et al., 1997) and ethyl benzene (Hard, 2002).

To ensure that the hazard assessments and classification of chemicals, particularly those that have caused CPN exacerbation, are not compromised, it is important to be able to discriminate CPN-related tubules of little biological significance from genuine preneoplastic hyperplasia. There is general agreement that atypical tubule proliferation, termed atypical tubule hyperplasia (ATH) in some classifications (Alden et al., 1992; Hard et al., 1995), is an obligatory precursor of renal tubule tumor development in the rat (Hard, 1986; Lipsky and Trump, 1988; Dietrich and Swenberg, 1991; Nogueira et al., 1993). This view has culminated over the years from the consistent results of many studies on renal tumor pathogenesis using a wide variety of chemical carcinogens, including aflatoxin B1 (Epstein et al., 1969), dimethylnitrosamine (Hard and Butler, 1971), N-ethyl-N-hydroxy-ethyl nitrosamine (Hiasa et al., 1979), N-(4'-fluoro-4-biphenyl)acetamide (Dees et al., 1980), N-nitrosomorpholine (Bannasch, 1984), and ochratoxin A (Boorman et al., 1992). Criteria for diagnosing ATH have been published by the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (Alden et al., 1992) and the Society of Toxicologic Pathology (Hard et al., 1995).

Recently, we conducted a histopathologic survey of a large sample of rats with advanced and end-stage CPN, identifying unusual tubule profiles that were integral components of CPN, and providing recommendations for their discrimination from ATH (Hard and Seely, 2005). In that survey, we accessed 2-year carcinogenicity studies for 8 chemicals held in the NTP Archives, concentrating on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained male rat kidney sections. We have now carried out additional histological procedures, including serial sectioning and some special staining methods, in order to further characterize the nature of the unusual CPN-associated profiles and to highlight differences from ATH. The new results reported here are intended to be used in conjunction with, and to complement, the findings described previously in the Hard and Seely (2005) report.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The 8 chemicals in the NTP carcinogenicity testing program evaluated for CPN severity and renal tubule tumors and neoplastic precursors in male rats (Hard and Seely, 2005), were: quercetin (NTP, 1992), coumarin (NTP, 1993), ozone (NTP, 1994), oxazepam (NTP, 1998a), chloroprene (NTP, 1998b), tetrahydrofuran (NTP, 1998c), isobutene (NTP, 1998d), and primidone (NTP, 2000). From these studies, specimens representing various morphological forms of proliferative tubule profiles were selected for further histological processing and characterization, as described next.

Severity Grading for CPN
The severity of CPN was graded semiquantitatively on a scale of 0–8 as described by Hard and Khan (2004). In this schema, grades 1–5 (minimal to high-moderate) represent a progressive increase in the number of focal lesions of CPN; grade 6 (low-severe), as the point where foci begin to coalesce into areas of cortical change; grade 7 (high-severe), where a majority of the outer parenchyma is affected by CPN; and grade 8 (end-stage), where no or almost no normal parenchyma remains. This final stage signals imminent death from chronic renal failure. In this study, advanced CPN was considered to span the grades from 6 through 8, but specimens were selected mainly from rats with high severe or end-stage disease (grades 7 and 8).

Special Stains
Selected kidney sections with specific CPN-related tubule lesions were stained with Masson’s trichrome (Sigma-Aldrich Accustain, St Louis, MO), periodic acid Schiff reagent (PAS) (AFIP, 1992), Lillie’s allochrome for discriminating basement membrane and collagen (AFIP, 1968), and Luna’s stain for differentiating new from mature collagen (Luna, 1992).

Serial Sectioning
The paraffin blocks of left and right kidneys from four male rats with end-stage (grade 8) CPN from the chloroprene and primidone 2-year studies were serially sectioned at 5 µ-intervals for a total of 50 sections. Each section in successive ribbons was picked up individually and placed on a sequentially numbered glass slide. The serial sections were stained with H&E, with every 10th section being immunohistochemically processed for anti-PCNA.

Immunohistochemical Staining for DNA Synthesis
DNA synthesis, as an indicator of cell proliferation, was demonstrated on paraffin-embedded sections by the immunohistochemical method for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), employing the ZymedPCNA staining kit (ZYMED Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA). This method uses a biotyinylated PCNA monoclonal antibody, clone PC 10 (60 minutes), with streptavidin-peroxidase as a signal generator (10 minutes), and dimethylaminobenzidine as the chromogen (5 minutes). After the deparaffinization and hydration procedures, the samples were subjected to an antigen retrieval step by microwave before further processing (2 individual 5-minute intervals at 50% power). Hydrogen peroxide (3%) was used to block endogenous peroxidase (10 minutes). The slides were counterstained in Mayer’s hematoxylin.

For comparison of proliferative rates, PCNA-labelled images of 3 samples of solid CPN tubule profiles and 2 samples of ATH were quantified for cells undergoing DNA synthesis using Image Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).

Fluorescence Microscopy
Multiple specimens of H&E-stained CPN tubule profiles, foci of ATH, and adenomas, were examined for autofluorescence at a wavelength of 450 nm using an Olympus AX80 microscope.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In Hard and Seely (2005), the morphological forms of tubule profile associated with advanced to end-stage CPN were described as "intratubular cell clusters," "dilated tubule profiles," and "solid tubule profiles." These same descriptions are used here for convenience, but as stated previously (Hard and Seely, 2005), we are not recommending the adoption of these terms for general use. We advocate the inclusion of such lesions under the generic term CPN tubule profile, or simply acknowledged as part of the spectrum of CPN pathomorphology.

Special Stains
With the various connective tissue stains applied to kidneys affected by severe and end-stage CPN, including Masson’s trichrome, PAS, Lillie’s allochrome, and Luna’s stain, it was confirmed that the "solid tubule profiles," and most "dilated tubule profiles," were characterized by a surrounding band of very thickened basement membrane, which merged into expanding collagen. Lillie’s allochrome in particular, was useful for discriminating the thickened tubular basement membrane, which stained red to purple, from the surrounding, blue-green staining collagen (Figure 1). Both Lillie’s allochrome (Figure 2) and PAS staining also highlighted the tortuosity of the thickened basement membrane surrounding the many atrophic tubules present. With Luna’s stain, it was observed that the majority of collagen occupying the intertubular space in severe and end-stage CPN represented an immature (blue-staining) rather than a mature (red-staining) form of collagen (Figure 3). Many of the CPN-affected tubules appeared to be partially or completely collapsed because of the increasing fibrotic process, in keeping with the implication that CPN might be a disease of expanding extracellular matrix (Abrass, 2000). A previous immunohistochemical study of the interstitial fibrosis in CPN identified abnormal deposition of collagen types I, III, and IV, along with fibronectin and tenascin in fibrotic areas adjacent to dilated or atrophic tubules (Nakatsuji et al., 1998).

View larger version (742K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1 Lillie’s allochrome stain of end-stage kidney discriminates the thickened basement membrane (purple) surrounding a series of "solid tubule profiles" from the collagen (blue) contributing to the expanding extracellular matrix. 2.—Lillie’s allochrome stain of end-stage kidney shows the tortuosity of the thickened basement membrane surrounding atrophic tubules. 3. —Luna’s stain for discriminating precollagen from mature collagen shows that the majority of the extracellular matrix in the interstitium of an end-stage kidney is immature collagen (blue). Mature collagen (red) is mainly in a perivascular location.

View larger version (491K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4 Selected serial sections of an "intratubular cell cluster." The profile involves a proximal tubule that is newly incorporated into the CPN process, and the cell cluster was present over a distance of only 30 µ. The single tubule involved is marked with an arrow in each frame. (a) section 25, (b) section 28, (c) section 31, (d) section 36. H&E.

View larger version (540K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5 Selected serial sections of a "dilated tubule profile." The profile in (a) persists over a relatively long distance but convolutes into 2 profiles before terminating in a series of atrophic tubule profiles (arrows). Proliferations of the epithelial lining, seen as small protruberances, were discontinuous along the tubule length. (a) section 46, (b) section 35, (c) section 24, (d) section 16. H&E.

View larger version (530K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6 Selected serial sections of modestly solid tubule profiles within an island of expanded extracellular matrix showing that the multiple profiles in (a) and (d) represent the convolutions of a single proximal tubule, over a short distance of 30 µ. (a) section 8, (b) section 11, (c) section 12, (d) section 14. H&E.

View larger version (3961K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7 Selected serial sections of a "solid tubule profile." The plaque-like lesion in (c) arises from and terminates in profiles of atrophic tubules (arrows). (a) section 19, (b) section 23, (c) section 35, (d) section 42.

PCNA Immunohistochemistry
In severe and end-stage kidney (grades 6–8), 2 tubular components of the usual CPN spectrum showed a relatively high degree of proliferative activity. These were the well-formed basophilic tubules that appeared to have been most recently incorporated into the CPN process, and series of nondistinctive dilated tubules lined by a single layer of cuboidal epithelium (Figure 8). Tubules containing hyaline proteinaceous casts (lined by very flattened epithelium), and atrophic tubules, were negative for anti-PCNA labeling (Figure 8). In addition, among the distinctive tubule profiles described in the Hard and Seely (2005) report, "intratubular cell clusters" (Figure 9), and hypertrophic tubules, lacked PCNA reactivity. "Solid tubule profiles" set in an area of expanded basement membrane, including those of relatively large size, showed only a low level of positive staining (Figure 10). In striking contrast, foci of ATH and incipient adenomas were hotspots for anti-PCNA labeling, reflecting a high proliferative rate (Figure 11). Quantification of the percentage of cells in DNA synthesis for 2 samples of ATH showed a range of 14.5–16.4%, compared to 0–1.2% for 3 samples of "solid tubule profiles."

View larger version (1259K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 8 Anti-PCNA immunostaining in end-stage CPN. There is a high level of cell turnover in dilated tubules lined by cuboidal epithelium (black asterisks), and in proximal convoluted tubules undergoing early incorporation into the CPN process (red asterisks). In contrast, tubules with flattened lining dilated by hyaline protein casts (green asterisks), and atrophic tubules (arrowheads) are negative for cell proliferation. 9.— Anti-PCNA immunostaining of an "intratubular cell cluster." In contrast to scattered cells with labelled nuclei in the adjacent tubule profiles (arrows), the intralumenal cell mass is negative for proliferative activity. This is the same lesion as depicted in Figure 3 (serial section 30). 10.—Anti-PCNA immunostaining of a "solid tubule profile." There is only a low level of proliferative activity, indicated by few positively stained nuclei, representing 1.2% of the cell population in this image of the lesion. 11.—Anti-PCNA immunostaining of a focus of atypical tubule hyperplasia. The preneoplastic lesion shows a high level of labeled nuclei, representing 14.5% of the cell population in this image of the lesion. 12.—Fluorescence microscopy of (a) a "solid tubule profile," and (b) a focus of atypical tubule hyperplasia. The large CPN plaque-like lesion shows no internal autofluorescence between cells, in contrast to the preneoplastic focus, which is typified by autofluorescing wisps of new basement membrane insinuating into the cell mass.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
This histological investigation of tubule profiles of unusual appearance encountered in severe and end-stage CPN, using special stains, serial sectioning, immunohistochemistry for DNA synthesis, and fluorescence microscopy, has underscored the biological difference between this spectrum of CPN lesions and those representing the precursor stage of renal tubule neoplasia. The data add confirmatory support to our recommendations (Hard and Seely, 2005) that such lesions should not be identified as preneoplastic in 2-year carcinogenicity bioassays where advanced CPN is a confounding factor.

In particular, serial sectioning was informative in characterizing the origin and fate of intratubular cell clusters, dilated tubule profiles, and solid tubule profiles. The "intratubular cell clusters" were confined to proximal convoluted tubules that were undergoing early incorporation into the CPN disease process, and were very small lesions, negative for proliferative activity. Solitary "dilated tubule profiles" and "solid tubule profiles" appeared to be connected at each end with atrophic tubules, but in the intervening distance, showed none of the features of ATH described in our previous report (Hard and Seely, 2005).

In this respect, it was significant that they lacked any margination of fibroblasts throughout their length, which would have been indicative of an expanding lesion (Hard and Seely, 2005). Solitary "dilated tubule profiles" sometimes appeared to have an increased number of epithelial lining cells in the form of low polypoid protruberances, but these were discontinuous along the length of the tubule dilation. As Risdon and Woolf (1998) have pointed out, cellular proliferation would be expected in the lining epithelium of some dilating tubules in order to accommodate the expanding luminal volume. The alternative would be a stretching and flattening of the lining cells, as is also seen in CPN when tubules become dilated with hyaline casts or colloid, and accordingly, these latter proved to be negative for proliferative activity.

Furthermore, "solid tubule profiles," which were sometimes the most difficult CPN lesion to distinguish from preneoplastic foci, were typified by a level of cell turnover that was demonstrably less than was characteristic of ATH and small adenomas. In addition they lacked the autofluorescing wisps or patches of basement membrane that were present in all of the ATH and adenomas examined under fluorescent illumination. As suggested previously (Hard et al., 1997; Hard, 2002), "solid tubule profiles" might represent an attempt by the failing kidney to regenerate tubule epithelium, particularly as these profiles involved tubules that were otherwise undergoing atrophy.

In conclusion, this histological investigation provides further support for the contention that the diagnostically challenging tubule profiles often occurring in advanced cases of rat CPN, particularly where there has been exacerbation of CPN severity by the test chemical, are biologically different from preneoplastic tubule lesions. Significantly increased PCNA labeling for DNA synthesis, and delicate basement membrane extensions into the cell mass, add to the criteria identified in Hard and Seely (2005) for discriminating ATH from CPN tubule profiles. The finding that "dilated" and "solid" tubule profiles represent modifications of atrophic tubules also reinforces the recommendation that such profiles should not be reported as separate entities from CPN in carcinogenicity studies.

	Acknowledgments

 
This work was funded in part with Federal funds from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, under Contract NO1-ES-95435, to Experimental Pathology Laboratories (EPL) Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC. Gordon Hard gratefully acknowledges Drs. Melvin Hamlin and Jerry Hardisty of EPL, and Robert Maronpot of NIEHS for the opportunity to pursue this investigation. Both authors also wish to acknowledge the encouragement provided by Dr. Maronpot throughout the project. The authors are grateful for the expert services provided by EPL, including the histological techniques performed by Nancy Harris and other staff of the EPL Histology Unit, and the preparation of photographic illustrations by Maureen Puccini and Emily Singletary.

	Footnotes

 
The opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and should not be construed to necessarily reflect the policies or opinions of the National Toxicology Program.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Abrass, CK. (2000). The nature of chronic progressive nephropathy in aging rats. Adv Renal Replacement Therapy, 7, 4-10

AFIP, Luna, LG (Ed.). (1968). Manual of the Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. (3) 72-3). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company

AFIP, Prophet, EB, Mills, B, Arrington, JB, & Sobin, LH (Eds.). (1992). Laboratory Methods in Histotechnology (pp.151-2). Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology

Alden, CL, Hard, GC, Krieg, K, Takahashi, M, & Turusov, V. In Mohr, U (Ed.). (1992). International Classification of Rodent Tumors. Part 1 – The Rat 3. Urinary System (pp.1-46). Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Scientific Publications No. 122

Bannasch, P. (1984). Sequential cellular changes during chemical carcinogenesis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 108, 11-22[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Boorman, GA, McDonald, MR, Imoto, S, & Persing, R. (1992). Renal lesions induced by ochratoxin A exposure in the F344 rat. Toxicol Pathol, 20, 236-45[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Dees, JH, Heatfield, BM, Reuber, MD, & Trump, BF. (1980). Adenocarcinoma of the kidney. III. Histogenesis of renal adenocarcinomas induced in rats by N-(4'-fluoro-4-biphenyl)acetamide. J Natl Cancer Inst, 64, 1537-45[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Dietrich, DR, & Swenberg, JA. (1991). Preneoplastic lesions in rodent kidney induced spontaneously or by non-genotoxic agents: predictive nature and comparison to lesions induced by genotoxic carcinogens. Mutation Res, 248, 239-60[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Epstein, SM, Bartus, B, & Farber, E. (1969). Renal epithelial neoplasms induced in male Wistar rats by oral aflatoxin B. Cancer Res, 29, 1045-50[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eustis, SL, Hailey, JR, Boorman, GA, & Haseman, JK. (1994). The utility of multiple-section sampling in the histopathological evaluation of the kidney for carcinogenicity studies. Toxicol Pathol, 22, 457-72[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hard, GC. (1986). Experimental models for the sequential analysis of chemically-induced renal carcinogenesis. Toxicol Pathol, 14, 112-22[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hard, GC. (2002). Significance of renal effects of ethyl benzene in rodents for assessing human carcinogenic risk. Toxicol Sci, 69, 30-41[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hard, GC, Alden, CL, Stula, EF, & Trump, BF. (1995). Proliferative lesions of the kidney in rats. Guides for Toxicologic Pathology (pp.1-19). Washington, DC: STP/ARP/AFIP

Hard, GC, & Butler, WH. (1971). Morphogenesis of epithelial neoplasms induced in the rat kidney by dimethylnitrosamine. Cancer Res, 31, 1496-505[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hard, GC, & Khan, NK. (2004). A contemporary overview of chronic progressive nephropathy in the laboratory rat, and its significance for human risk assessment. Toxicol Pathol, 32, 171-80[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Hard, GC, & Seely, JC. (2005). Recommendations for the interpretation of renal tubule proliferative lesions occurring in rat kidneys with advanced chronic progressive nephropathy (CPN). Toxicol Pathol, 33, 641-9[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hard, GC, Whysner, J, English, JC, Zang, E, & Williams, GM. (1997). Relationship of hydroquinone-associated rat renal tumors with spontaneous chronic progressive nephropathy. Toxicol Pathol, 25, 132-43[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hiasa, Y, Ohshima, M, Iwata, C, & Tanikate, T. (1979). Histopathological studies on renal tubular cell tumors in rats treated with N-ethyl-N-hydroxyethylnitrosamine. Gann, 70, 817-20[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Lipsky, MM, & Trump, BF. (1988). Chemically induced renal epithelial neoplasia in experimental animals. Int Rev Exp Pathol, 30, 357-83[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Lock, EA, & Hard, GC. (2004). Chemically induced renal tubule tumors in the laboratory rat and mouse: review of the NCI/NTP database and categorization of renal carcinogens based on mechanistic information. Crit Rev Toxicol, 34, 211-99[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Luna, LG. (1992). Histopathologic Methods and Color Atlas of Special Stains and Tissue Artifacts (pp.453-4). Downers Grove, IL: Johnson Printers

Nakatsuji, S, Yamate, J, & Sakuma, S. (1998). Macrophages, myofibroblasts, and extracellular matrix in interstitial fibrosis of chronic progressive nephropathy in aged rats. Vet Pathol, 35, 352-60[Abstract]

Nogueira, E, Cardesa, A, & Mohr, U. (1993). Experimental models of renal carcinogenesis. Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 119, 190-8

NTP. (1992). Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Quercetin (CAS No. 117-39-5) in F344/N Rats (Feed Studies). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program, NIH. NTP Technical Report No. 409.

NTP. (1993). Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Coumarin (CAS No. 91-64-5) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F₁ Mice (Gavage Studies). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program, NIH. NTP Technical Report No. 422.

NTP. (1994). Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Ozone (CAS No. 10028-15-6) and Ozone/NNK (CAS No. 10028-15-6/64092-91-4) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F₁ Mice (Inhalation Studies). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program, NIH. NTP Technical Report No. 440.

NTP. (1998a). Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Oxazepam (CAS No. 604-75-1) in F344/N Rats (Feed Studies). Research Triangle Park, NC: NIH. NTP Technical Report No. 468. National Toxicology Program.

NTP. (1998b). Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Chloroprene (CAS No. 126-99-8) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F₁ Mice (Inhalation Studies). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program, NIH. NTP Technical Report No. 467.

NTP. (1998c). Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Tetrahydrofuran (CAS No. 109-99-9) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F₁ Mice (Inhalation Studies). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program, NIH. NTP Technical Report No. 475, NIH Publication No. 98–3965.

NTP. (1998d). Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Isobutene (CAS No. 115-11-7) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F₁ Mice (Inhalation Studies). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program, NIH. NTP Technical Report No. 487.

NTP. (2000). Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Primidone (CAS No. 125-33-7) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F₁ Mice (Feed Studies). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program, NIH. NTP Technical Report No. 476.

Risdon, RA, & Woolf, AS. In Jennette, JC, Olson, JL, Schwartz, MM, & Silva, FG (Eds.). (1998). Developmental defects and cystic diseases of the kidney. Heptinstall’s Pathology of the Kidney, 5, (2) 1149-205). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 34, No. 7, 941-948 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/01926230601083381


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hard, G. C. Articles by Seely, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hard, G. C. Articles by Seely, J. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?