| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Comparison of Histochemical Methods for Murine Eosinophil Detection in an RSV Vaccine-enhanced Inflammation Model
1 Department of Pathology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City Correspondence: David K. Meyerholz, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, 1165ML, Iowa City, Iowa 52242; e-mail:david-meyerholz{at}uiowa.edu.
A comparative study of histochemical detection of eosinophils in fixed murine tissue is lacking. Five histochemical methods previously reported for eosinophil detection were quantitatively and qualitatively compared in an established murine RSV vaccine–enhanced inflammation model. Nonspecific neutrophil staining was evaluated in tissue sections of neutrophilic soft tissue lesions and bone marrow from respective animals. Eosinophils had granular red to orange-red cytoplasmic staining, depending on the method, whereas neutrophils had, when stained, a more homogenous cytoplasmic pattern. Nonspecific background staining of similar coloration was variably seen in vascular walls and erythrocytes. Astra Blue/Vital New Red, Congo Red, Luna, Modified Hematoxylin and Eosin, and Sirius Red techniques were all effective in detecting increased eosinophil recruitment compared to controls; however, differences in eosinophil quantification varied significantly between techniques. Astra Blue/Vital New Red had the best specificity for differentiating eosinophils and neutrophils but had a reduced ability to enumerate eosinophils and was the most time intensive. The Luna stain had excessive nonspecific staining of tissues and a reduced enumeration of infiltrating eosinophils, which made it suboptimal. For multiple parameters such as eosinophil detection, specificity, and contrast with background tissues, the Sirius Red followed by Congo Red and Modified Hematoxylin and Eosin methods were useful, each with their own staining qualities.
Key Words: detection • eosinophil • histochemistry • lung • mouse • RSV Abbreviations: AB/VNR, Astra Blue/Vital New Red • H&E, hematoxylin and eosin • IFN, interferon • KO, knock out • mod H&E, modified hematoxylin and eosin • MHV, mouse hepatitis virus • RSV, respiratory syncytial virus • WT, wild-type
Respiratory diseases are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide (WHO 2001). Asthma, eosinophilic pneumonia, allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis, and vaccine-enhanced RSV inflammation are representative of various pulmonary diseases characterized by eosinophilic inflammation, and these conditions have been previously reviewed (Alberts 2004; Castilow et al. 2007; Cottin and Cordier 2005; Fulginiti et al. 1969; Kim et al. 1969; Scott and Wardlaw 2006; Smith 1992; Teran et al. 1999). Investigation of either pathogenesis or efficacy assessment of prophylactic/therapeutic treatment for these diseases requires detectable end points such as pulmonary eosinophil recruitment, in model animals (Broström et al. 2007; Lemière et al. 2006; Menzies-Gow et al. 2007). Whereas bronchoalveolar lavage can be a useful tool in this assessment, it does not readily detect changes of eosinophil distribution in the lung and may not recognize eosinophil recruitment that has not entered into the alveolar air space (Castilow, Meyerholz et al. 2008). Inbred and genetically engineered murine models are commonly used to study eosinophilic respiratory diseases (Lai et al. 2008). Murine eosinophils are identified in routinely stained hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) tissue sections by an eosinophilic granular cytoplasm and a bi-lobed nucleus, whereas morphologic differentiation from neutrophils can be challenging for some investigators, since neutrophils have overlapping morphologic characteristics (Percy et al. 2007). Although the H&E method can be used to detect eosinophils in tissue (Arantes-Costa et al. 2008), investigators often report using a variety of histochemical methods to further identify and quantify these leukocytes in tissue sections. Review of the literature suggests there is little consensus as to which histochemical method is optimal and whether or not there are selective advantages in the use of specific methods. In this study, we assess five histochemical methods reported in the literature for their effectiveness for detection of eosinophils in fixed tissue sections.
RSV Vaccination Model All experimental animal protocols were approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The vaccine-enhanced respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) inflammation model is regulated through RSV protein vaccination in conjunction with a genetic background variation of mice (Castilow, Olson et al. 2008). Briefly, interferon (IFN)-  –competent (BALB/cAnNCr, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, n = 7) and –deficient mice (BALB/c.129S7 (B6)-Ifngtm1Ts/J, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, n = 7) were vaccinated with RSV fusion (F) protein using a vaccinia virus (3 x 106 PFU via scarification at the base of the tail). Three weeks later the mice were intranasally inoculated with 1–3 x 106 PFU RSV (A2 strain). RSV infection promotes prominent eosinophilic pulmonary inflammation in IFN-–deficient mice, whereas IFN-–competent mice lack eosinophilic inflammation (Castilow, Olson et al. 2008). After seven days, the mice were euthanized (via cervical dislocation) and the lung tissues harvested.
Tissues
Congo Red Protocol
Luna Protocol
Astra Blue/Vital New Red Protocol (AB/VNR)
Sirius Red Stain Protocol
Modified H&E Protocol
Eosinophil Quantification and Statistics
Qualitative Assessment of Eosinophil Staining
Routine H&E can be an effective method for eosinophil detection. However, for some investigators, the "overlapping" staining pattern and morphology of eosinophils versus neutrophils can be problematic. In addition, eosin staining of background tissues can lower the visual detection of the target (eosinophil granules) and lower the optical contrast between cellular target and background (Figure 1), which can increase time required for examination and cause eye strain when examining numerous slide sections (personal experience of the authors).
In this study we assessed five histochemical stains previously reported for eosinophil detection (Figure 2). In tissue sections, eosinophils typically had a fine to moderately sized, distinctly granular cytoplasmic staining that varied in coloration and contrast with surrounding tissues depending on the histochemical method. Whereas coloration differences were obvious between methods, there were no dramatic differences in eosinophil staining intensity during examination. Some background tissues, including vascular walls and erythrocytes, often had staining coloration similar to eosinophil granules (Table 1). Whereas this finding did not seem to prevent visual detection of eosinophils, it did slow the efficiency and speed of examination because of the lowered contrast between eosinophils and background tissue. The Luna method had the most noticeable background staining that was patchy and included the nucleus/cytoplasm of various epithelia and stroma. In preliminary work, this background staining could be reduced by decreasing incubation times of the Hematoxylin-Biebrich scarlet solution; however, doing so further reduced the detectability and intensity of eosinophil staining. For most methods, using freshly prepared reagents for each batch was crucial for optimal consistency, as staining pattern differences can occur between batches.
Each histochemical method was further assessed as to its ability to detect quantitative differences in pulmonary eosinophil recruitment in the RSV vaccine–enhanced inflammation model. Each method was able to detect statistically significant increases in eosinophil infiltration in IFN- –deficient (KO) as compared to IFN-–competent (WT) mice as expected for the model (p < .001 for all methods, Figure 3). Interestingly, eosinophil detection in KO mice was dissimilar in extent between methods, as the AB/VNR exhibited a significantly lower mean eosinophil count than Mod H&E (p < .001), Sirius Red (p < .006), and Congo Red (p < .003). The Luna method also yielded a lower mean eosinophil count than Mod H&E (p < .001), Sirius Red (p < .01), and Congo Red (p < .01).
An area of concern for investigators is the ability to readily differentiate tissue granulocytes as eosinophils and neutrophils. This is, in part, the underlying motivation for the use of special stains in many published studies. An optimal histochemical method would specifically detect eosinophils while excluding neutrophils. To further assess this ability, we examined the various methods in bone marrow and soft tissues of two mice with chronic cervical botryomycosis and three mice infected with a strain of MHV (MHV data not shown) in which neutrophilic inflammation is predominant. In the bone marrow of these respective mice, eosinophils were detected by moderate- to high-intensity granular cytoplasmic staining. Eosinophil granule staining was equivalent to or slightly greater in the bone marrow compared to those seen in the lung of the RSV inflammation model. Neutrophils were morphologically detected based on slightly smaller size and typical nuclear morphology. Neutrophil cytoplasmic staining intensity ranged from absent to mild/moderate and, when present, cytoplasmic staining was homogenous, diffuse, and less intense than that of eosinophils. The AB/VNR method had a distinct absence of neutrophil staining with only rare detection (Figure 2 and Table 1). The Luna method had variable patchy neutrophil staining in bone marrow similar to the patchiness seen with background staining. The Mod H&E, Congo Red, and Sirius Red all had a relative absence to mild amount of neutrophil staining, though the Mod H&E seemed to have slightly more neutrophil and background staining than the other two methods. Bone marrow eosinophil and neutrophil staining patterns were representative of those seen in the periphery of neutrophilic lesions. Neutrophil detection was typically confined to the periphery of the lesion and often in the vasculature or perivascular space. Once neutrophils were extravasated, there seemed to be rapid loss neutrophil staining (if present), which seemed to correspond with neutrophil degranulation, as might be expected. Only the Luna method produced irregular to patchy staining, which included nuclear and cytoplasmic staining, in the degenerate neutrophils of the abscess. Further considerations for histochemical staining of eosinophils are cost, technician labor time, and total stain time. For our laboratory, the total estimated material costs for one slide were comparable and ranged from $1.13 (Congo Red) to $2.59 (Luna). Technician labor time was similar and ranged from seven (Congo red) to fifteen (Luna) minutes, with the exception of AB/VNR, which was longer, about forty-five minutes. The total method time from start to finish was similar at thirty-five to forty-five minutes, with the exception of the AB/VNR, which took two hours.
Detection and quantification of murine eosinophils in tissues are major end points for investigators studying pathogenic mechanisms and in efficacy assessment of novel therapeutics in eosinophilic pulmonary diseases. Our study is topical and relevant, as many of these techniques are commonly used (Hirasawa et al. 2007; Reis et al. 2001; Vermaelen et al. 2003); however, documentation regarding their comparative usefulness for eosinophil detection in murine tissues is lacking. In this RSV vaccine–enhanced inflammation model, all candidate methods were useful to detect increased pulmonary eosinophil recruitment. Interestingly, there was significant variation in the absolute enumeration of eosinophils between methods, even though they were serially sectioned through the same tissues. There are several possible explanations that could account for such variations. (1) Each method has different suggested binding mechanisms (Table 1) for eosinophils, which may have likely caused variations in uptake and affected detectability. (2) The presence of nonspecific staining in neutrophils could, in some instances, contribute to elevated eosinophil enumeration. The use of differences in staining pattern (e.g., distinct granules in eosinophils and diffuse homogenous staining in neutrophils) and morphology are useful to prevent this detection artifact. (3) "Increased" tissue staining (including both eosinophil granules and non-specific background tissue), as seen with some techniques (e.g., Mod H&E), may also allow for enhanced staining of partially degranulated eosinophils, which otherwise might be marginally stained (Daneshpouy 2002). (4) Lastly, the level of visual contrast as well as the chromatic preferences by the examiner must be taken into account, as this promotes a level of "user-friendliness" in tissue examination, a concept that can be appreciated by many pathologists. The authors of this study preferred the contrast offered by the red granular appearance of eosinophils on a lighter counterstained background, as is seen in the Sirius Red method versus the orange to red granular staining on a darker counter-stain background used in the Congo Red and Mod H&E methods. Histochemical methods can sometimes be modified to adjust various parameters including eosinophil staining, background staining, and neutrophil staining so as to meet the preferences and comfort level of the investigator (Kiernan 2006). The resulting assessment of histochemical methods for eosinophil detection allows for some interpretative characterizations. The Luna method had generally higher amounts of patchy background staining of pulmonary epithelia and stroma. The cellular distribution of this background staining was similar to published images of Luna-stained murine lung (Angeli et al. 2008; Cottin and Cordier 2005; Hoenerhoff et al. 2006). This extra background staining may, in part, mask eosinophils from quick detection, as suggested by the lower quantitation of pulmonary eosinophils. In addition, the Luna method also had a comparatively higher extent of neutrophil staining, but this finding did not evidently contribute to many false positives, as it still had the lowest eosinophil count. The patchy nonspecific background and neutrophil staining suggest the Luna method should be excluded for eosinophil detection, especially in consideration of the other histochemical methods described in this study. The AB/VNR method showed good contrast between eosinophils and tissue background. Furthermore, it was very specific for eosinophils with near total absence of neutrophil staining, making it a viable option for investigators where specificity is essential or if the examiner has minimal histopathologic experience. In contrast, the AB/VNR method had reduced eosinophil enumeration ability and took moderately longer to complete (both direct labor and total technique time), potentially limiting its use. Sirius Red followed by Congo Red and Mod H&E proved to be our preferred histochemical methods for eosinophil detection. Each stain gave similar representative eosinophil numbers, had minimal neutrophil staining, and had good contrast between eosinophils and background tissue for a "user-friendly" readability. The Sirius Red method was preferred because of the excellent tissue contrast for ease of eosinophil identification and cellular specificity, which are both useful for investigators screening large numbers of tissues. Although the Congo Red did function well, it had slightly more neutrophil staining and the counterstain (as described from the published source) was darker than preferred, but the distinctive orange-red coloration of eosinophil granules as useful in eosinophil identification. The Mod H&E had a good detection of eosinophils in the lung; however, this method also had slightly more neutrophil and background staining than the Sirius Red or Congo Red methods. We have demonstrated that each of the selected histochemical methods reported in the literature is able to discern quantitative changes in the RSV vaccine–enhanced inflammation model. Even so, distinct differences were observed between methods in eosinophil enumeration and detection, along with nonspecific neutrophil or background tissue staining. This study suggests that Sirius Red, Congo Red, and Mod H&E are all viable options for murine eosinophil detection, whereas the AB/VNR method might be used only for selective situations and the Luna method may be avoided. Furthermore, selection of a histochemical method should take into consideration the examiner’s histopathology experience as well as any chromatic preferences for a more productive and "ergonomic" visual examination.
This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant AI-063520 (SMV), American Heart Association–Midwest Affiliate Pre-doctoral Fellowship (EMC), and the Department of Pathology, University of Iowa (DKM). We would like to thank Chris Hochstedler, Janis Rodgers, Ed Solin and the Comparative Pathology Laboratory for technical assistance (Department of Pathology, University of Iowa).
Alberts, W. (2004). Eosinophilic interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 10, 419-24[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Angeli, P, Prado, C, Xisto, Debora, Silva, P, Passaro, C, Nakazato, H, Leick-Meldonado, E, Martins, M, Rocco, P, & Tiberio, I. (2008). Effects of chronic L-NAME treatment lung tissue mechanics, eosinophilic and extracellular matrix responses induced by chronic pulmonary inflammation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 294, 1197-205[CrossRef] Arantes-Costa, F, Lopes, F, Toledo, A, Magliarelli-Filho, P, Moriya, H, Carvalho-Oliveira, R, Mauad, T, Saldiva, P, & Martins, M. (2008). Effects of residual oil fly ash (ROFA) in mice with chronic allergic pulmonary inflammation. Toxicol Pathol, 36, 680-86 Broström, E, Katz-Salamon, M, Lundahl, J, Halldén, G, & Winbladh, B. (2007). Eosinophil activation in preterm infants with lung disease. Acta Paediatr, 96, 23-28[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Castilow, E, Olson, M, & Varga, S. (2007). Understanding respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine-enhanced disease. Immunol Res, 39, 225-39[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Castilow, E, Meyerholz, D, & Varga, S. (2008). IL-13 is required for eosinophil entry into the lung during respiratory syncytial virus vaccine-enhanced disease. J Immunol, 180, 2376-84 Castilow, E, Olson, M, Meyerholz, D, & Varga, S. (2008). IFN- Cottin, V, & Cordier, J. (2005). Eosinophilic pneumonias. Allergy, 60, 841-57[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Daneshpouy, M, Socie, G, Lemann, M, Rivet, J, Gluckman, E, & Janin, A. (2002). Activated eosinophils in upper gastrointestinal tract of patients with graft-versus-host disease. Blood, 99, 3033-40 Duffy, JP, Smith, PJ, Crocker, J, & Matthews, HR. (1993). Combined staining method for the demonstration of tissue eosinophils and mast cells. J Histotechnol, 16, 143-44[Web of Science] Friend, D, Gurish, M, Austen, K, Hunt, J, & Stevens, R. (2006). Senescent jejunal mast cells and eosinophils in the mouse preferentially translocate to the spleen and draining lymph node, respectively, during the recovery phase of helminth infection. J Immunol, 165, 344-52 Fulginiti, V, Eller, J, Sieber, O, Joyner, J, Minamitani, M, & Meiklejohn, G. (1969). Respiratory virus immunization I: a field trial of two inactivated respiratory virus vaccines; an aqueous trivalent para-influenza virus vaccine and an alum-precipitated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. Am J Epidemiol, 89, 435-48 Hirasawa, M, Ito, Y, Shibata, M, & Otsuki, Y. (2007). Mechanisms of inflammation in murine eosinophilic myocarditis produced by adoptive transfer with ovalbumin challenge. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 142, 28-39[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Hoenerhoff, M, Starost, M, & Ward, J. (2006). Eosinophilic crystalline pneumonia as a major cause of death in 129S4/SvJae mice. Vet Pathol, 43, 682-88 Kiernan, J. (1999). Histological and Histochemical Methods: Theory and Practice. (3rd ed). Somerset, UK: Bath Press Kiernan, J. (2006). Dyes and other colorants in microtechniques and biomedical research. Color Technol, 122, 1-21[CrossRef] Kim, H, Canchola, J, Brandt, C, Pyles, G, Chanock, R, Jensen, K, & Parrott, R. (1969). Respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants despite prior administration of antigenic inactivated vaccine. Am J Epidemiol, 89, 422-34 Lai, W, Goh, H, Bao, Z, Wong, W, Melendez, A, & Leung, B. (2008). The role of sphingosine kinase in a murine model of allergic asthma. J Immunol, 180, 4323-29 Lemière, C, Ernst, P, Olivenstein, R, Yamauchi, Y, Govindaraju, K, Ludwig, MS, Martin, JG, & Hamid, Q. (2006). Airway inflammation assessed by invasive and noninvasive means in severe asthma: eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 118, 1033-39[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Llewellyn, B. (1970). An improved Sirius red method for amyloid. J Med Lab Technol, 23, 308 Menzies-Gow, AN, Flood-Page, PT, Robinson, DS, & Kay, AB. (2007). Effect of inhaled interleukin-5 on eosinophil progenitors in the bronchi and bone marrow of asthmatic and non-asthmatic volunteers. Clin Exp Allergy, 37, 1023-32[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Percy, D, & Barthold, S. (2007). Pathology of Laboratory Rodents and Rabbits. (3rd ed). Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing Reis, L, Ventura, T, Souza, S, Arana-Pino, A, Pelajo-Machado, M, Pereira, M, Lenzi, H, Conceicao, M, & Takiya, C. (2001). Quantitative and qualitative interferences of pentoxifillyne on hepatic Schistosoma masoni granulomas: effects on extracellular matrix and eosinophil population. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 96, 107-12[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Scott, K, & Wardlaw, A. (2006). Eosinophilic airway disorders. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 27, 128-33[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Smith, H. (1992). Asthma, inflammation, eosinophils and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Clin Exp Allergy, 22, 187-97[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Teran, LM, Carroll, MP, Shute, JK, & Holgate, ST. (1999). Interleukin 5 release into asthmatic airways 4 and 24 hours after endobronchial allergen challenge: its relationship with eosinophil recruitment. Cytokine, 11, 518-22[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] Vacca, LL. (1985). Laboratory Manual of Histochemistry. New York, NY: Raven Press Vermaelen, K, Cataldo, D, Tournoy, K, Maes, T, Dhulst, A, Louis, R, Foidart, J, Noel, A, & Pauwels, R. (2003). Matrix metalloprotienase-9-mediated dendritic cell recruitment into the airways is a critical step in a mouse model of asthma. J Immunol, 171, 1016-22 World Health Organization. (2001). WHO consultation on the development of a comprehensive approach for the prevention and control of chronic respiratory diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO
This version was published on February
1, 2009 Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 37, No. 2,
249-255 (2009) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Top
Abstract
Introduction
