Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicologic Pathology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tilson, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tilson, H. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Role of Developmental Neurotoxicology Studies in Risk Assessment

Hugh A. Tilson

Neurotoxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

A number of questions have been raised about the use of the US Environmental Protection Agency's Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing Guideline (DNTG) in the hazard identification of chemicals. The applicability and sensitivity of animal tests in the DNTG relative to human developmental neurotoxicity have recently been questioned. In a workshop held in 1989, participants compared the effects of several known developmental neurotoxicants in humans and animal models and concluded that the DNTG would have detected known human developmental neurotoxicants. They also concluded that although procedural differences may differ in the testing of humans and animals, the neurobiologic functions (ie, autonomic, sensory, motor, and cognitive) affected by chemical exposure were similar. In cases where the DNTG has been compared with other measures of reproductive and developmental toxicity, the DNTG has been relatively sensitive and specific. To date, DNTGs have been required 12 times, for 9 pesticides and 3 solvents. The sensitivity of the measures in the DNTG relative to other measures of developmental and adult toxicity supports the continued use of the DNTG in risk assessment.

Key Words: Testing guidelines • testing strategies • chemical effects on developing nervous system

References

  • Acuff KD, Vorhees CV (1998). Neurobehavioral teratology. In: Introduction to Neurobehavioral Toxicology: Food and Environment, Niesink RJM, Jaspers RMA, Kornet LMW, van Ree JM, Tilson HA (eds). CRC Press, New York, pp 27-69.
  • Barnes DG, Dourson DG (1988). Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in human health risk assessments. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 8: 471-486.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Barone S., Stanton ME, Mundy WR (1995). Neurotoxic effects of neonatal triethyltin (TET) exposure are exacerbated with aging. Neurobiol Aging 16: 723-735.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Calabrese EF (1985). Uncertainty factors and interindividual variation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 5: 190-196.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dews PB ( 1986). On the assessment of risk. In: Developmental Behavioral Pharmacology, Krasnegor N, Gray T, Thompson T (eds). Erlbaum, Hillside, New Jersey, pp 53-65.
  • Dourson ML, Felter SP, Robinson D. (1996). Evolution of science-based uncertainty factors in noncancer risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 24: 108-120.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dourson ML, Stara JF (1983). Regulatory history and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factors. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 3: 224-238.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Faber WD, O'Donoghue JL (1991). Does the Chernoff-Kavlock screening assay for developmental neurotoxicity detect developmental neurotoxicants? Toxicologist 11: 345A.
  • Francis EZ, Kimmel CA, Rees DC ( 1990). Workshop on the qualitative and quantitative comparability of human and animal developmental neurotoxicity: Summary and implications. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12: 285-292.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Goldey ES, Tilson HA, Crofton KM (1995). Implications of the use of neonatal birth weight, growth, viability, and survival data for predicting developmental neurotoxicity: A survey of the literature. Neurotoxicol Teratol 17: 313-332.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Harry GJ (ed) (1994). Developmental Neurotoxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
  • Hattis D., Erdreich L., Ballew M. (1987). Human variability in susceptibility to toxic chemicals: A preliminary analysis of pharmacokinetic data from normal volunteers. Risk Anal 7: 415-426.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hutchings DE (ed) (1989). Prenatal Abuse of Licit and Illicit Drugs, Vol 562. New York Academy of Science, New York.
  • Kimmel CA (1988). Current status of behavioral teratology: Science and regulation. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 19: 1-10.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kimmel CA, Buelke-Sam J., Adams J. (1985). Collaborative behavioral teratology study: Implications, current applications and future directions. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7: 669-674.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kimmel C.A., Rees DC, Francis EZ (1990). Qualitative and quantitative comparability of human and animal developmental neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12: 175-292.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kutscher CL, Sembrat M., Kutscher CS, Kutscher NL (1985). Effects of the high methyl mercury dose used in the Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study on Brain Anatomy. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7: 775-777.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lochry EA (1987). Concurrent use of behavioral/functional testing in existing reproductive and developmental toxicity screens: Practical considerations. J Am Coll Toxicol 6: 433-439.[Web of Science]
  • Makris S., Raffale K., Sette W., Seed J. ( 1998). A Retrospective Analysis of Twelve Developmental Neurotoxicity Studies Submitted to the USEPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances (OPPTS). EPA Science Advisory Panel, Washington, D.C.
  • National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (1988). Research on Children and Adolescents with Mental, Behavioral, and Developmental Disorders. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  • National Research Council (NRC) (1993). Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  • Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD (1998) OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. Proposal for a New Guideline for Developmental Neurotoxicity Study. OECD, Washington, D.C.
  • Rees DC, Francis EZ, Kimmel CA (1990). Scientific and regulatory issues relevant to assessing risk for developmental neurotoxicity: An overview. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12: 175-181.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Renwick AG (1998). Toxicokinetics in infants and children in relation to the ADI and TDI. Food Addit Contam 15: 17-35.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Renwick AG, Lazarus NR (1998). Human variability and noncancer risk assessment—An analysis of the default uncertainty factor. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 27: 3-20.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Reuhl KR (1991). Delayed expression of neurotoxicity: The problem of silent damage. Neurotoxicology 12: 341-346.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Riley EP, Vorhees CV (eds) (1986). Handbook of Behavioral Teratology. Plenum, New York.
  • Sheehan DM, Gaylor DW (1990). Analysis of the adequacy of safety factors. Teratology 41: 590-591.
  • Stanton ME, Spear LP (1990). Workshop on the qualitative and quantitative comparability of human and animal developmental neurotoxicity, Work Group I report: Comparability of measures of developmental neurotoxicity in humans and laboratory animals. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12: 1-7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ulbrich B., Palmer AK (1996). Neurobehavioral aspects of developmental toxicity testing. Environ Health Perspect. 104: 407-412.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ( 1991). Revised Neurotoxicity Test Guidelines for Pesticides. National Information Service, Washington, D.C.
  • US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1998). Health Effects Test Guidelines: Developmental Neurotoxicity Study. OPPTS 870.6300, EPA Document 712-C-98-239. EPA, Washington, D.C.
  • US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1998). Suggested Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methodology for Evaluating Pesticides with a Common Mechanism of Toxicity: Organophosphate Case Study. EPA Scientific Advisory Panel, Washington, D.C.
  • Vorhees CV (1985). Behavioral effects of prenatal D-amphetamine in rats: A parallel trial to the Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7: 709-716.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Vorhees CV (1985). Behavioral effects of prenatal methyl mercury in rats: A parallel trial to the Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7: 717-725.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Vohees CV (1986). Comparison and critique of government regulations for behavioral teratology. In: Handbook of Behavioral Teratology, Riley EP, Vorhees CV (eds). Plenum, New York, pp 49-66.
  • Wallinga D. (1998). Putting Children First: Making Pesticide Levels in Food Safer for Infants and Children. Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, D.C.
  • Wilson JG (1977). Embryotoxicity of drugs in man. In: Handbook of Teratology, Wilson JG, Fraser FC (eds). Plenum, New York, pp 309-355.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) (1986). Draft Guidelines for the Assessment of Drugs and Other Chemicals for Behavioral Teratogenicity. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 149-156 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/019262330002800119


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tilson, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tilson, H. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?