Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicologic Pathology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopp-Schneider, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopp-Schneider, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*N-NITROSOMORPHOLINE
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Biostatistical Evaluation of Focal Hepatic Preneoplasia

Annette Kopp-Schneider

Central Unit Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, PO Box 101949, D-69009 Heidelberg, Germany, kopp{at}dkfz.de

Qualitative analyses of focal hepatic preneoplasia are relatively easy and fast but hypothesis tests based on these analyses often lack statistical power. Evaluating focal hepatic preneoplasia quantitatively, on the other hand, requires more effort but is rewarded by an increased ability to detect differences between treatment groups and by the possibility to investigate the mechanism of a treatment under study. Due to the stereological problems inherent in the data a statistical analysis that concentrates on the evaluation of area fraction will provide clear results whereas the analysis of focal transection density and size distribution can produce misleading results. In addition, the area fraction is a valid variable even in the presence of confluent foci. The number and size distribution of focal transections in liver sections cannot be directly translated to the number and sizes of foci in the liver. As no general statements about the relationship between focal transection density and foci density as well as between focal transection size and foci size distribution can be made, there is need for a parametric mechanistic model to link the number and size distribution of focal transections to those of the underlying foci. The stereological problem therefore can be avoided by introducing a model for foci appearance and change of volume that then can be used to conclude whether the treatment induces foci and whether it changes their volume.

Key Words: Focal hepatic preneoplasia • stereology • volume fraction • foci density • mechanistic model.

References

  • Enzmann H., Edler L., Bannasch P. (1987). Simple elementary method for the quantification of focal liver lesions induced by carcinogens. Carcinogenesis 8: 231—235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Fullman RL (1953). Measurement of particle sizes in opaque bodies. Trans AIME 197: 447—452.
  • Geisler I., Kopp-Schneider A. (2000). A model for hepatocarcinogenesis with clonal expansion of three successive phenotypes of preneoplastic cells. Math Biosci 168: 167—185.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Imaida K., Tatematsu M., Kato T., Tsuda H., Ito N. (1989). Advantages and limitations of stereological estimation of placental glutathione S-Transferase-positive rat-liver cell foci by computerized 3-dimensional reconstruction. Jap J Cancer Res 80: 326—330.[Web of Science]
  • Kopp-Schneider A., Portier CJ, Bannasch P. (1998). A model for hepatocarcinogenesis treating phenotypical changes in focal hepatocellular lesions as epigenetic events. Math Biosci 148: 181—204.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Moolgavkar SH, Luebeck EG, de Gunst M., Port RE, Schwarz M. (1990). Quantitative analysis of enzyme-altered foci in rat hepatocarcinogenesis experiments I: Single agent regimen. Carcinogenesis 11: 1271—1278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Morris RW (1989). Testingstatisticalhypotheses aboutratliverfoci. Toxicol Pathol 17: 569—578.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ohser J., Lurz U. ( 1994). Quantitative Gefügeanalyse: Theoretische Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Deutscher Verlag f. Grundstoffindustrie Freiberger Forschungshefte B274.
  • Ohser J., Sandau K. (2000). Considerations about the estimation of size distribution in Wicksell's corpuscle problem. In: Statistical Physics and Spatial Statistics. Ser. Lecture Notes in Physics, Mecke K, Stoyan D (eds). Springer, Heidelberg.
  • Pugh TD, King JH, Koen H., Nychka D., Chover J., Wahba G. (1983). Reliable stereologiocal method for estimating the number of microscopic hepatocellular foci from their transections. Cancer Res 43: 1261—1268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Weber E., Bannasch P. (1994). Dose and time dependence of cellular phenotype in rat hepatic preneoplasia and neoplasia induced in stop experiments by oral exposure to N-nitrosomorpholine. Carcinogenesis 15: 1227— 1234.
  • Wicksell SD (1925). The corpuscle problem. A mathematical study of a biometrical problem. Biometrika 17: 84—99.[Free Full Text]

Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 31, No. 1, 121-125 (2003)
DOI: 10.1080/01926230390173860


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
P. Bannasch
Comments on R. Karbe and R. L. Kerlin (2002). Cystic Degeneration/Spongiosis Hepatis (Toxicol Pathol 30 (2), 216--227) PETER BANNASCH
Toxicol Pathol, August 1, 2003; 31(5): 566 - 570.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopp-Schneider, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopp-Schneider, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*N-NITROSOMORPHOLINE
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?