|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Toxicology and New Social Ethics for Animals
Bernard E. Rollin
University Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, 240 Willard O. Eddy Hall, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1781, bernard.rollin{at}colostate.edu
The issue of animal treatment has emerged as a major social concern over the past three decades. This ramified in a new ethic for animal treatment that goes beyond concern about cruelty and attempts to eliminate animal pain and suffering, whatever its source. This is evidenced by laws governing animal research in many countries. Insofar as toxicology can entail significant and prolonged animal suffering, it is at loggerheads with this new ethic. Ways are suggested for the toxicological community to put itself in harmony with the ethic and thereby preserve its autonomy.
Key Words: Animal welfare • animal rights • new social ethic for animals • toxicology.
References
- For a detailed account of the social conditions giving rise to the demand for a new ethic for animals, see B. Rollin: Farm Animal Welfare ( Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1995) Part I. For a philosophically based rational reconstruction of the new ethic see Rollin B. (1992). Animal Rights and Human Morality, 2nd ed, Prometheus Buffalo, NY. For a utilitarian account of the new ethic see Peter Singer: Animal Liberation ( New York: New York Review of Books Press, 1975). For a rights based account see Tom Regan: The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).
- de Greeve P., de Leeuw W. (1997). Developments in Alternatives and Animal Use in Europe. In: Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics, vanZutphen LFM, Balls M (eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam.
- Shalev M. (1998). European and U.S. regulation of monoclonal antibodies. Lab Animal, January, 1998. 15 ff.
- O'donoghue P. (1992). European regulation of animal experiments. Lab Animal, September 1991. 20 ff.
- See Rollin BE (1989). The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consiousness, Animal Pain and Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Gaskell G. et al (1997). Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. Nature 387: 845 ff.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rollin BE (1998). Social ethics, animal suffering, and the creation of transgenic animal models of human genetic disease. In: Bioethics and the Use of Laboratory Animals, Kraus AL, Renquist D (eds). American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine, Benoit, Dubuque, Iowa, pp 109—123.
Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 31, No. 1 suppl,
128-131 (2003)
DOI: 10.1080/01926230390175011
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
